SEAC.DE vs. IS3S.DE
SEAC.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) and IS3S.DE (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - SEAC.DE tracks the MSCI World SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped while IS3S.DE tracks the MSCI World Enhanced Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SEAC.DE returned 10.67%/yr vs 17.35%/yr for IS3S.DE. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SEAC.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IS3S.DE.
Performance
SEAC.DE vs. IS3S.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEAC.DE achieves a 9.72% return, which is significantly lower than IS3S.DE's 35.27% return.
SEAC.DE
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 17.77%
- 3Y*
- 14.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- —
IS3S.DE
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 11.04%
- YTD
- 35.27%
- 6M
- 38.20%
- 1Y
- 63.38%
- 3Y*
- 26.82%
- 5Y*
- 17.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.60%
SEAC.DE vs. IS3S.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEAC.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 9.72% | 1.57% | 23.09% | 24.89% | -20.42% | 36.15% | 7.56% | 32.13% | -0.88% |
IS3S.DE iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF | 35.27% | 25.13% | 11.36% | 15.62% | -4.81% | 30.38% | -12.53% | 22.01% | -8.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEAC.DE and IS3S.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2018 | 0.81 |
The correlation between SEAC.DE and IS3S.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEAC.DE vs. IS3S.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SEAC.DE
IS3S.DE
SEAC.DE vs. IS3S.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (SEAC.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IS3S.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEAC.DE | IS3S.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.83 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 10.36 | -9.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.62 | 39.01 | -37.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEAC.DE | IS3S.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 4.53 | -3.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 1.24 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.68 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
SEAC.DE vs. IS3S.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEAC.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.50%, smaller than the maximum IS3S.DE drawdown of -35.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEAC.DE and IS3S.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEAC.DE | IS3S.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.50% | -35.18% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.82% | -6.09% | -13.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.60% | -17.80% | -4.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.64% | -17.80% | -5.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.73% | -0.83% | -4.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -5.82% | -1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.87% | 1.62% | +9.25% |
Volatility
SEAC.DE vs. IS3S.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (SEAC.DE) is 3.05%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IS3S.DE) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that SEAC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3S.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEAC.DE | IS3S.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 5.62% | -2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.42% | 11.32% | -1.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.99% | 13.93% | +11.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 13.85% | +4.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 15.76% | +2.25% |
SEAC.DE vs. IS3S.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEAC.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than IS3S.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEAC.DE vs. IS3S.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SEAC.DE nor IS3S.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SEAC.DE and IS3S.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEAC.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEAC.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IS3S.DE.
SEAC.DE tracks MSCI World SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while IS3S.DE tracks MSCI World Enhanced Value. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SEAC.DE and 0.30% for IS3S.DE.
Find the right allocation for SEAC.DE and IS3S.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer