CBUG.DE vs. VUTA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L).
CBUG.DE and VUTA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CBUG.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD. It was launched on Dec 8, 2021. VUTA.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government TR USD. It was launched on Feb 19, 2019. Both CBUG.DE and VUTA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CBUG.DE vs. VUTA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CBUG.DE vs. VUTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUG.DE iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) | 3.51% | 6.47% | 13.17% | 11.34% | -14.17% | 2.96% |
VUTA.L Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating | 1.40% | -6.28% | 7.45% | 0.19% | -6.94% | -0.83% |
Different Trading Currencies
CBUG.DE is traded in EUR, while VUTA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUTA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUG.DE achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly higher than VUTA.L's 1.40% return.
CBUG.DE
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- -3.83%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 8.66%
- 1Y
- 18.59%
- 3Y*
- 10.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VUTA.L
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- 1Y
- -3.99%
- 3Y*
- 0.54%
- 5Y*
- 0.11%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CBUG.DE vs. VUTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUG.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VUTA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CBUG.DE vs. VUTA.L — Risk / Return Rank
CBUG.DE
VUTA.L
CBUG.DE vs. VUTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUG.DE | VUTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | -0.53 | +1.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.45 | -0.65 | +2.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.92 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | -0.48 | +2.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.75 | -0.74 | +9.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUG.DE | VUTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | -0.53 | +1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.11 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUG.DE and VUTA.L is -0.08. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
CBUG.DE vs. VUTA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBUG.DE nor VUTA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CBUG.DE vs. VUTA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUG.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.59%, which is greater than VUTA.L's maximum drawdown of -17.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUG.DE and VUTA.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUG.DE | VUTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.59% | -23.40% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.97% | -7.50% | -6.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.22% | -17.70% | +13.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.74% | -15.29% | +7.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 4.37% | -2.22% |
Volatility
CBUG.DE vs. VUTA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L) at 1.87%. This indicates that CBUG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUTA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CBUG.DE | VUTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 1.87% | +3.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | 4.07% | +6.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.77% | 7.48% | +10.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 8.49% | +8.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 8.72% | +8.10% |