PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEA vs. MADE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEA vs. MADE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) and iShares U.S. Manufacturing ETF (MADE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEA achieves a 20.79% return, which is significantly lower than MADE's 22.94% return.


SEA

1D
-0.80%
1M
0.23%
YTD
20.79%
6M
21.12%
1Y
30.09%
3Y*
18.52%
5Y*
10Y*

MADE

1D
0.07%
1M
4.90%
YTD
22.94%
6M
24.56%
1Y
50.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEA vs. MADE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SEA
U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF
20.79%16.78%-9.41%
MADE
iShares U.S. Manufacturing ETF
22.94%27.34%2.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SEA and MADE is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024

0.50

SEA vs. MADE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SEA
MADE

Industrials

82.7%
72.6%

Energy

17.3%
1.8%

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.1%

Technology

-1.6%
16.9%

Industrials

SEA
82.7%
MADE
72.6%

Energy

SEA
17.3%
MADE
1.8%

Communication Services

SEA
0.0%
MADE

-

Basic Materials

SEA

-

MADE

-

Consumer Cyclical

SEA

-

MADE
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

SEA

-

MADE

-

Financial Services

SEA

-

MADE

-

Healthcare

SEA

-

MADE

-

Real Estate

SEA

-

MADE

-

Utilities

SEA

-

MADE
0.1%

Technology

SEA
-1.6%
MADE
16.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEA vs. MADE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEA
SEA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

MADE
MADE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MADE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MADE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
MADE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MADE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MADE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEA vs. MADE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) and iShares U.S. Manufacturing ETF (MADE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEAMADEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.41

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

3.76

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.52

16.45

-4.93

SEA vs. MADE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the MADE Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEA and MADE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEAMADEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

2.47

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

1.28

-0.89

Drawdowns

SEA vs. MADE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEA drawdown since its inception was -39.53%, which is greater than MADE's maximum drawdown of -23.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEA and MADE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEAMADEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.53%

-23.79%

-15.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

-13.43%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.07%

0.00%

-3.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.31%

-3.82%

-10.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

3.06%

-0.44%

Volatility

SEA vs. MADE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) is 5.17%, while iShares U.S. Manufacturing ETF (MADE) has a volatility of 7.43%. This indicates that SEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MADE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEAMADEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

7.43%

-2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.01%

16.99%

-4.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.28%

20.51%

-4.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.67%

22.30%

-0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.67%

22.30%

-0.63%

SEA vs. MADE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MADE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEA vs. MADE - Dividend Comparison

SEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, more than MADE's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MADE
iShares U.S. Manufacturing ETF
0.65%0.89%0.34%0.00%0.00%
SEA
U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF
5.59%6.76%18.47%9.85%18.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEA and MADE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MADE has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to SEA (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEA dropped -39.53% vs MADE's -23.79%.

On 1-year performance, MADE leads with 50.25% vs 30.09% for SEA. On fees, MADE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, SEA has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MADE has performed better with a 50.25% return vs 30.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MADE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SEA.

SEA has the higher dividend yield at 5.59%, compared with 0.65% for MADE.

SEA tracks U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while MADE tracks S&P U.S. Manufacturing Select Index. They also come from different issuers: US Global and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SEA and 0.40% for MADE.

MADE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEA and MADE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer