PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDY vs. FDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDY vs. FDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDY achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly lower than FDT's 25.50% return. Over the past 10 years, SDY has underperformed FDT with an annualized return of 9.29%, while FDT has yielded a comparatively higher 10.91% annualized return.


SDY

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.81%
YTD
7.49%
6M
7.45%
1Y
12.80%
3Y*
9.83%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*
9.29%

FDT

1D
-0.64%
1M
5.22%
YTD
25.50%
6M
28.63%
1Y
55.05%
3Y*
30.08%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDY vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDY
SPDR S&P Dividend ETF
7.49%8.18%8.45%2.61%-0.54%25.32%1.71%23.29%-2.74%15.82%
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
25.50%52.21%6.97%15.03%-19.51%11.43%4.29%16.82%-19.98%34.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SDY and FDT is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2011

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between SDY and FDT has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SDY vs. FDT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDY
FDT

Industrials

17.5%
34.0%

Consumer Defensive

17.1%
2.8%

Utilities

14.8%
5.2%

Financial Services

11.5%
10.2%

Technology

8.7%
8.1%

Basic Materials

6.4%
9.6%

Healthcare

6.2%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
11.5%

Real Estate

4.6%
5.3%

Energy

4.6%
9.2%

Communication Services

3.5%
2.7%

Industrials

SDY
17.5%
FDT
34.0%

Consumer Defensive

SDY
17.1%
FDT
2.8%

Utilities

SDY
14.8%
FDT
5.2%

Financial Services

SDY
11.5%
FDT
10.2%

Technology

SDY
8.7%
FDT
8.1%

Basic Materials

SDY
6.4%
FDT
9.6%

Healthcare

SDY
6.2%
FDT
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SDY
5.2%
FDT
11.5%

Real Estate

SDY
4.6%
FDT
5.3%

Energy

SDY
4.6%
FDT
9.2%

Communication Services

SDY
3.5%
FDT
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDY vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDY
SDY Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDY Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDY Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

FDT
FDT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDY vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDYFDTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.54

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

4.13

-2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.60

16.12

-11.51

SDY vs. FDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the FDT Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDY and FDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDYFDTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

3.00

-1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.69

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.59

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.40

+0.07

Drawdowns

SDY vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDY drawdown since its inception was -54.75%, which is greater than FDT's maximum drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDY and FDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDYFDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.75%

-46.10%

-8.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.67%

-13.41%

+5.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.39%

-14.29%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.21%

-33.18%

+17.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.70%

-46.10%

+9.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.07%

-1.59%

-2.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-10.78%

+4.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

3.43%

-0.64%

Volatility

SDY vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) is 2.47%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that SDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDYFDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

7.23%

-4.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.43%

15.91%

-8.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.33%

18.42%

-8.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.03%

18.23%

-4.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.08%

18.52%

-1.44%

SDY vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDY vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison

SDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than FDT's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
2.84%3.27%3.89%4.36%2.29%3.80%2.42%2.78%2.13%1.57%1.76%1.83%
SDY
SPDR S&P Dividend ETF
2.48%2.61%2.56%2.64%2.55%2.63%2.85%2.45%2.73%4.69%3.30%6.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDY and FDT have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDT has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to SDY (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDY dropped -54.75% vs FDT's -46.10%.

On 10-year performance, FDT leads with 10.91% vs 9.29% for SDY. On fees, SDY is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SDY has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDT has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 9.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SDY is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.

FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 2.48% for SDY.

SDY is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while FDT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SDY tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SDY and 0.80% for FDT.

FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDY and FDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer