SDY vs. FDT
SDY (SPDR S&P Dividend ETF) and FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SDY is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while FDT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDY returned 9.29%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for FDT. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDY charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FDT.
Performance
SDY vs. FDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDY achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly lower than FDT's 25.50% return. Over the past 10 years, SDY has underperformed FDT with an annualized return of 9.29%, while FDT has yielded a comparatively higher 10.91% annualized return.
SDY
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 7.45%
- 1Y
- 12.80%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- 9.29%
FDT
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 25.50%
- 6M
- 28.63%
- 1Y
- 55.05%
- 3Y*
- 30.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
SDY vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDY SPDR S&P Dividend ETF | 7.49% | 8.18% | 8.45% | 2.61% | -0.54% | 25.32% | 1.71% | 23.29% | -2.74% | 15.82% |
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 25.50% | 52.21% | 6.97% | 15.03% | -19.51% | 11.43% | 4.29% | 16.82% | -19.98% | 34.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDY and FDT is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2011 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SDY and FDT has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SDY vs. FDT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDY
FDT
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
Technology
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Communication Services
Industrials
SDY
FDT
Consumer Defensive
SDY
FDT
Utilities
SDY
FDT
Financial Services
SDY
FDT
Technology
SDY
FDT
Basic Materials
SDY
FDT
Healthcare
SDY
FDT
Consumer Cyclical
SDY
FDT
Real Estate
SDY
FDT
Energy
SDY
FDT
Communication Services
SDY
FDT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDY vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank
SDY
FDT
SDY vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDY | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.54 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 4.13 | -2.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | 16.12 | -11.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDY | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 3.00 | -1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.69 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.59 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.40 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
SDY vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDY drawdown since its inception was -54.75%, which is greater than FDT's maximum drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDY and FDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDY | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.75% | -46.10% | -8.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.67% | -13.41% | +5.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.39% | -14.29% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.21% | -33.18% | +17.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.70% | -46.10% | +9.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.07% | -1.59% | -2.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -10.78% | +4.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 3.43% | -0.64% |
Volatility
SDY vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) is 2.47%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that SDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDY | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | 7.23% | -4.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.43% | 15.91% | -8.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.33% | 18.42% | -8.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.03% | 18.23% | -4.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.08% | 18.52% | -1.44% |
SDY vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDY vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison
SDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than FDT's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 2.84% | 3.27% | 3.89% | 4.36% | 2.29% | 3.80% | 2.42% | 2.78% | 2.13% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.83% |
SDY SPDR S&P Dividend ETF | 2.48% | 2.61% | 2.56% | 2.64% | 2.55% | 2.63% | 2.85% | 2.45% | 2.73% | 4.69% | 3.30% | 6.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDY and FDT have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDT has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to SDY (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDY dropped -54.75% vs FDT's -46.10%.
On 10-year performance, FDT leads with 10.91% vs 9.29% for SDY. On fees, SDY is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SDY has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FDT has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 9.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDY is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.
FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 2.48% for SDY.
SDY is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while FDT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SDY tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SDY and 0.80% for FDT.
FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDY and FDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer