SDY vs. AUSF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SDY (SPDR S&P Dividend ETF) and AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - SDY tracks the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index while AUSF tracks the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SDY returned 5.97%/yr vs 12.71%/yr for AUSF. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SDY charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for AUSF.

Performance

SDY vs. AUSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDY achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly higher than AUSF's 6.72% return.

SDY

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.81%
• YTD: 7.49%
• 6M: 7.45%
• 1Y: 12.80%
• 3Y*: 9.83%
• 5Y*: 5.97%
• 10Y*: 9.29%

AUSF

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 6.72%
• 6M: 7.67%
• 1Y: 15.11%
• 3Y*: 20.14%
• 5Y*: 12.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDY vs. AUSF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SDY SPDR S&P Dividend ETF	7.49%	8.18%	8.45%	2.61%	-0.54%	25.32%	1.71%	23.29%	-7.81%
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	6.72%	13.69%	16.05%	22.26%	-0.18%	27.48%	1.27%	24.06%	-10.79%

Correlation

The correlation between SDY and AUSF is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018	0.89

The correlation between SDY and AUSF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

SDY vs. AUSF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SDY	AUSF
Industrials	17.5%	11.7%
Consumer Defensive	17.1%	8.5%
Utilities	14.8%	4.0%
Financial Services	11.5%	18.7%
Technology	8.7%	13.5%
Basic Materials	6.4%	4.0%
Healthcare	6.2%	12.0%
Consumer Cyclical	5.2%	7.8%
Real Estate	4.6%	4.1%
Energy	4.6%	5.2%
Communication Services	3.5%	10.6%

Return for Risk

SDY vs. AUSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDY

SDY Risk / Return Rank: 33
SDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
SDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SDY Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
SDY Martin Ratio Rank: 31

AUSF

AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 44
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 39
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDY vs. AUSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SDY	AUSF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.50	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	2.18	-0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.26	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	2.60	-0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.60	7.54	-2.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SDY vs. AUSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the AUSF Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDY and AUSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SDY	AUSF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	1.50	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.94	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.65	-0.18

Drawdowns

SDY vs. AUSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDY drawdown since its inception was -54.75%, which is greater than AUSF's maximum drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDY and AUSF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDY	AUSF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.75%	-44.25%	-10.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.67%	-5.84%	-1.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.39%	-12.29%	-2.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.21%	-14.23%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.07%	-2.26%	-1.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.21%	-4.22%	-1.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.79%	2.01%	+0.78%

Volatility

SDY vs. AUSF - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) have volatilities of 2.47% and 2.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SDY	AUSF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.47%	2.41%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.43%	6.65%	+0.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.33%	10.14%	+0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.03%	13.65%	+0.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.08%	19.07%	-1.99%

SDY vs. AUSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than AUSF's 0.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDY vs. AUSF - Dividend Comparison

SDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than AUSF's 2.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	2.76%	2.78%	2.63%	1.83%	2.51%	2.22%	2.95%	4.02%	1.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SDY SPDR S&P Dividend ETF	2.48%	2.61%	2.56%	2.64%	2.55%	2.63%	2.85%	2.45%	2.73%	4.69%	3.30%	6.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDY and AUSF in my portfolio?

SDY and AUSF have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SDY or AUSF?

SDY has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to AUSF (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDY dropped -54.75% vs AUSF's -44.25%.

Which ETF is better, SDY or AUSF?

On 5-year performance, AUSF leads with 12.71% vs 5.97% for SDY. On fees, AUSF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SDY or AUSF?

Over the 5-year period, AUSF has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 5.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SDY or AUSF?

AUSF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SDY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SDY or AUSF?

AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 2.48% for SDY.

What is the main difference between SDY and AUSF?

SDY tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SDY and 0.27% for AUSF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AUSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.