PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDVY vs. VB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDVY vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (SDVY) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDVY achieves a 7.70% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 14.16% return.


SDVY

1D
-0.44%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
7.70%
6M
7.75%
1Y
20.08%
3Y*
17.26%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*

VB

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.52%
YTD
14.16%
6M
14.12%
1Y
28.82%
3Y*
17.05%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*
11.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDVY vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDVY
First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
7.70%8.83%11.19%28.58%-11.98%29.13%11.72%25.62%-15.26%5.78%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
14.16%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-9.34%3.55%

Correlation

The correlation between SDVY and VB is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.85

The correlation between SDVY and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

SDVY vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDVY
VB

Financial Services

33.5%
12.6%

Industrials

29.3%
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
11.3%

Technology

8.4%
17.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
3.4%

Basic Materials

4.2%
4.8%

Energy

3.0%
4.7%

Healthcare

3.0%
11.1%

Communication Services

1.8%
3.1%

Utilities

0.6%
3.3%

Real Estate

-

7.6%

Financial Services

SDVY
33.5%
VB
12.6%

Industrials

SDVY
29.3%
VB
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SDVY
10.2%
VB
11.3%

Technology

SDVY
8.4%
VB
17.2%

Consumer Defensive

SDVY
5.4%
VB
3.4%

Basic Materials

SDVY
4.2%
VB
4.8%

Energy

SDVY
3.0%
VB
4.7%

Healthcare

SDVY
3.0%
VB
11.1%

Communication Services

SDVY
1.8%
VB
3.1%

Utilities

SDVY
0.6%
VB
3.3%

Real Estate

SDVY

-

VB
7.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDVY vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDVY
SDVY Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDVY vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (SDVY) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDVYVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.31

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

3.22

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.49

11.87

-4.38

SDVY vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDVY Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDVY and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDVYVBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.78

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.34

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.44

-0.01

Drawdowns

SDVY vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDVY drawdown since its inception was -44.70%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDVY and VB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDVYVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.70%

-59.56%

+14.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-8.98%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.92%

-25.36%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.92%

-28.15%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.08%

-0.65%

-2.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.71%

-8.44%

+0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

2.43%

+0.26%

Volatility

SDVY vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (SDVY) is 4.14%, while Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that SDVY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDVYVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

4.42%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.89%

11.72%

-0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.34%

16.28%

-0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.04%

20.74%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.82%

21.42%

+3.40%

SDVY vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDVY has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDVY vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

SDVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, which matches VB's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDVY
First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
1.20%1.69%1.60%1.90%2.28%1.09%1.48%1.69%1.57%0.29%0.00%0.00%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.19%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDVY and VB have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VB has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to SDVY (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDVY dropped -44.70% vs VB's -59.56%.

On 5-year performance, SDVY leads with 8.43% vs 7.11% for VB. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SDVY has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SDVY has performed better with a 8.43% return vs 7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SDVY.

SDVY and VB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.20%.

SDVY tracks NASDAQ US Small Mid Cap Rising Dividend Achievers™ Index, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SDVY and 0.05% for VB.

VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDVY and VB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer