SDVY vs. CSB
SDVY (First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF) and CSB (VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - SDVY tracks the NASDAQ US Small Mid Cap Rising Dividend Achievers™ Index while CSB tracks the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SDVY returned 8.43%/yr vs 3.65%/yr for CSB. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SDVY charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CSB.
Performance
SDVY vs. CSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDVY achieves a 7.70% return, which is significantly lower than CSB's 8.30% return.
SDVY
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- 7.70%
- 6M
- 7.75%
- 1Y
- 20.08%
- 3Y*
- 17.26%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- —
CSB
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 8.30%
- 6M
- 7.74%
- 1Y
- 17.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
SDVY vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDVY First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 7.70% | 8.83% | 11.19% | 28.58% | -11.98% | 29.13% | 11.72% | 25.62% | -15.26% | 5.78% |
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 8.30% | 2.26% | 9.64% | 12.60% | -13.11% | 27.04% | 11.30% | 21.12% | -7.10% | 5.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDVY and CSB is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.85 |
The correlation between SDVY and CSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
SDVY vs. CSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDVY
CSB
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
SDVY
CSB
Industrials
SDVY
CSB
Consumer Cyclical
SDVY
CSB
Technology
SDVY
CSB
Consumer Defensive
SDVY
CSB
Basic Materials
SDVY
CSB
Energy
SDVY
CSB
Healthcare
SDVY
CSB
Communication Services
SDVY
CSB
Utilities
SDVY
CSB
Real Estate
SDVY
-
CSB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDVY vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank
SDVY
CSB
SDVY vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (SDVY) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDVY | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 1.25 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.05 | 1.92 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.22 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 2.51 | -0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.49 | 7.26 | +0.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDVY | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.25 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.20 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.45 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
SDVY vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDVY drawdown since its inception was -44.70%, which is greater than CSB's maximum drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDVY and CSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDVY | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.70% | -42.07% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -7.18% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.92% | -21.82% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.92% | -24.49% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.08% | -3.12% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.71% | -7.14% | -0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 2.48% | +0.21% |
Volatility
SDVY vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison
First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (SDVY) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) at 3.59%. This indicates that SDVY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDVY | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 3.59% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.89% | 9.19% | +1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.34% | 14.54% | +0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.04% | 18.78% | +2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.82% | 21.31% | +3.51% |
SDVY vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDVY has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CSB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDVY vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison
SDVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than CSB's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.26% | 3.54% | 3.12% | 3.45% | 3.60% | 3.11% | 3.70% | 3.19% | 3.45% | 3.19% | 2.85% | 1.57% |
SDVY First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.60% | 1.90% | 2.28% | 1.09% | 1.48% | 1.69% | 1.57% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDVY and CSB have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDVY has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to CSB (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDVY dropped -44.70% vs CSB's -42.07%.
On 5-year performance, SDVY leads with 8.43% vs 3.65% for CSB. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SDVY has performed better with a 8.43% return vs 3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SDVY.
CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.20% for SDVY.
SDVY tracks NASDAQ US Small Mid Cap Rising Dividend Achievers™ Index, while CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SDVY and 0.35% for CSB.
SDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDVY and CSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer