SDVD vs. TLTX
SDVD (FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF) and TLTX (Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDVD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Nasdaq US Small-Mid Cap Rising Dividend Achievers Index, while TLTX is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Global X. SDVD is passively managed, while TLTX is actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SDVD charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TLTX.
Performance
SDVD vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDVD achieves a 10.33% return, which is significantly higher than TLTX's 1.13% return.
SDVD
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 10.33%
- 6M
- 8.06%
- 1Y
- 22.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLTX
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDVD vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SDVD FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 10.33% | 8.79% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 1.13% | 6.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDVD and TLTX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDVD vs. TLTX — Risk / Return Rank
SDVD
TLTX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SDVD vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (SDVD) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDVD | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.52 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDVD vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDVD drawdown since its inception was -24.17%, which is greater than TLTX's maximum drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDVD and TLTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDVD | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.17% | -6.35% | -17.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -2.62% | +1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.88% | -2.29% | -2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | — | — |
Volatility
SDVD vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDVD | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.36% | 9.26% | +5.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 9.26% | +8.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 9.26% | +8.85% |
SDVD vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDVD has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDVD vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison
SDVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.74%, less than TLTX's 17.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SDVD FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 8.74% | 8.36% | 9.26% | 3.18% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 17.25% | 7.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDVD and TLTX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TLTX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLTX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SDVD.
TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 17.25%, compared with 8.74% for SDVD.
SDVD is categorized as Derivative Income, while TLTX is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SDVD and 0.29% for TLTX.
Find the right allocation for SDVD and TLTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer