SDVD vs. TLTX
SDVD (FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF) and TLTX (Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDVD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Nasdaq US Small-Mid Cap Rising Dividend Achievers Index, while TLTX is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Global X. SDVD is passively managed, while TLTX is actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SDVD charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TLTX.
Performance
SDVD vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDVD achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly higher than TLTX's -0.36% return.
SDVD
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 7.75%
- 6M
- 8.14%
- 1Y
- 19.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLTX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- -1.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDVD vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SDVD FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 7.75% | 8.21% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | -0.36% | 5.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDVD and TLTX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDVD vs. TLTX — Risk / Return Rank
SDVD
TLTX
SDVD vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (SDVD) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDVD | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.65 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDVD | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.63 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
SDVD vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDVD drawdown since its inception was -24.17%, which is greater than TLTX's maximum drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDVD and TLTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDVD | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.17% | -6.35% | -17.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.31% | -4.05% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.86% | -2.27% | -2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | — | — |
Volatility
SDVD vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDVD | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.31% | 9.14% | +5.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 9.14% | +9.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 9.14% | +9.05% |
SDVD vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDVD has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDVD vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison
SDVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.95%, less than TLTX's 15.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SDVD FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 8.95% | 8.36% | 9.26% | 3.18% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 15.79% | 7.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDVD and TLTX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TLTX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLTX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SDVD.
TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 15.79%, compared with 8.95% for SDVD.
SDVD is categorized as Derivative Income, while TLTX is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SDVD and 0.29% for TLTX.
Find the right allocation for SDVD and TLTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer