PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDVD vs. CHPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDVD vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (SDVD) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDVD achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 85.77% return.


SDVD

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
7.75%
6M
8.14%
1Y
19.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CHPY

1D
1.14%
1M
29.53%
YTD
85.77%
6M
85.49%
1Y
149.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDVD vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SDVD and CHPY is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDVD vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDVD
SDVD Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SDVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDVD Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SDVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDVD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPY
CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDVD vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (SDVD) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDVDCHPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.81

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

12.38

-10.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.65

47.28

-39.63

SDVD vs. CHPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDVD Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the CHPY Sharpe Ratio of 5.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDVD and CHPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDVDCHPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

5.47

-4.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

4.83

-4.06

Drawdowns

SDVD vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDVD drawdown since its inception was -24.17%, which is greater than CHPY's maximum drawdown of -12.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDVD and CHPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDVDCHPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.17%

-12.17%

-12.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-12.17%

+3.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

0.00%

-3.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.86%

-1.98%

-2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

3.18%

-0.61%

Volatility

SDVD vs. CHPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (SDVD) is 3.78%, while YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that SDVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDVDCHPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

11.23%

-7.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

22.33%

-12.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.31%

27.59%

-13.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

33.17%

-14.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

33.17%

-14.98%

SDVD vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDVD has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDVD vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison

SDVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.95%, less than CHPY's 28.40% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CHPY
YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF
28.40%28.19%0.00%0.00%
SDVD
FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
8.95%8.36%9.26%3.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDVD and CHPY have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHPY has higher volatility (11.23%) compared to SDVD (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDVD dropped -24.17% vs CHPY's -12.17%.

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 149.72% vs 19.64% for SDVD. On fees, SDVD is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, SDVD has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 149.72% return vs 19.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SDVD is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CHPY.

CHPY has the higher dividend yield at 28.40%, compared with 8.95% for SDVD.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SDVD and 0.99% for CHPY.

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.47 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDVD and CHPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer