SDUS.L vs. LGUG.L
SDUS.L (iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and LGUG.L (L&G US Equity UCITS ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from iShares and Legal & General respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SDUS.L returned 14.04%/yr vs 13.69%/yr for LGUG.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDUS.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for LGUG.L.
Performance
SDUS.L vs. LGUG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SDUS.L is traded in USD, while LGUG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LGUG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SDUS.L having a 10.25% return and LGUG.L slightly lower at 10.22%.
SDUS.L
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.25%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- 1Y
- 28.55%
- 3Y*
- 23.31%
- 5Y*
- 14.04%
- 10Y*
- —
LGUG.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 10.22%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 27.73%
- 3Y*
- 22.45%
- 5Y*
- 13.69%
- 10Y*
- —
SDUS.L vs. LGUG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDUS.L iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 10.25% | 17.72% | 26.89% | 30.69% | -21.32% | 28.28% | 22.03% | 28.82% |
LGUG.L L&G US Equity UCITS ETF | 10.22% | 18.03% | 25.32% | 27.94% | -20.49% | 28.34% | 20.57% | 29.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDUS.L and LGUG.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2019 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SDUS.L and LGUG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SDUS.L vs. LGUG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDUS.L
LGUG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
SDUS.L
LGUG.L
Financial Services
SDUS.L
LGUG.L
Communication Services
SDUS.L
LGUG.L
Consumer Cyclical
SDUS.L
LGUG.L
Healthcare
SDUS.L
LGUG.L
Industrials
SDUS.L
LGUG.L
Consumer Defensive
SDUS.L
LGUG.L
Real Estate
SDUS.L
LGUG.L
Energy
SDUS.L
LGUG.L
Basic Materials
SDUS.L
LGUG.L
Utilities
SDUS.L
LGUG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDUS.L vs. LGUG.L — Risk / Return Rank
SDUS.L
LGUG.L
SDUS.L vs. LGUG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SDUS.L) and L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDUS.L | LGUG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.44 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 3.07 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.48 | 13.09 | -0.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDUS.L | LGUG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.43 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.87 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 1.14 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
SDUS.L vs. LGUG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDUS.L drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, roughly equal to the maximum LGUG.L drawdown of -32.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDUS.L and LGUG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDUS.L | LGUG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.90% | -32.98% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.48% | -8.98% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.29% | -19.60% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.23% | -26.46% | +0.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -0.54% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -5.71% | +0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 2.11% | +0.17% |
Volatility
SDUS.L vs. LGUG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SDUS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.55% compared to L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUG.L) at 2.82%. This indicates that SDUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGUG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDUS.L | LGUG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | 2.82% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.26% | 8.30% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.46% | 11.35% | +1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 16.14% | +0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 19.14% | -0.91% |
SDUS.L vs. LGUG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDUS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LGUG.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SDUS.L vs. LGUG.L - Dividend Comparison
SDUS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while LGUG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGUG.L L&G US Equity UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDUS.L iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.73% | 0.80% | 0.90% | 1.06% | 1.32% | 0.95% | 1.18% | 1.40% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, SDUS.L and LGUG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LGUG.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGUG.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for SDUS.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SDUS.L and 0.05% for LGUG.L.
Find the right allocation for SDUS.L and LGUG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer