LGUG.L vs. CNKY.L
Compare and contrast key facts about L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUG.L) and iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L).
LGUG.L and CNKY.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LGUG.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Nov 7, 2018. CNKY.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the TOPIX TR JPY. It was launched on Jan 25, 2010. Both LGUG.L and CNKY.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LGUG.L or CNKY.L.
Key characteristics
| LGUG.L | CNKY.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 26.82% | 6.94% |
| 1Y Return | 32.40% | 12.40% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.45% | 1.64% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 18.77% | 4.60% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.76 | 0.66 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.90 | 1.00 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.53 | 1.13 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.79 | 0.76 |
| Martin Ratio | 19.28 | 1.79 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.64% | 6.23% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.42% | 16.95% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.75% | -23.61% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -7.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGUG.L and CNKY.L is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
LGUG.L vs. CNKY.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LGUG.L achieves a 26.82% return, which is significantly higher than CNKY.L's 6.94% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LGUG.L vs. CNKY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGUG.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CNKY.L's 0.48% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LGUG.L vs. CNKY.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUG.L) and iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LGUG.L vs. CNKY.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LGUG.L nor CNKY.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
LGUG.L vs. CNKY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGUG.L drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, roughly equal to the maximum CNKY.L drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGUG.L and CNKY.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LGUG.L vs. CNKY.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUG.L) is 3.29%, while iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that LGUG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNKY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.