PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LGUG.L vs. QQQM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


LGUG.LQQQM
YTD Return26.36%25.91%
1Y Return32.32%37.02%
3Y Return (Ann)11.33%9.99%
Sharpe Ratio2.792.12
Sortino Ratio3.932.80
Omega Ratio1.541.38
Calmar Ratio4.842.70
Martin Ratio19.469.88
Ulcer Index1.64%3.71%
Daily Std Dev11.42%17.28%
Max Drawdown-24.75%-35.05%
Current Drawdown0.00%-0.23%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between LGUG.L and QQQM is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

LGUG.L vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LGUG.L having a 26.36% return and QQQM slightly lower at 25.91%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.37%
15.42%
LGUG.L
QQQM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LGUG.L vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGUG.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Expense ratio chart for QQQM: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%
Expense ratio chart for LGUG.L: current value at 0.05% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.05%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LGUG.L vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUG.L) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGUG.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LGUG.L, currently valued at 2.92, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.92
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LGUG.L, currently valued at 3.99, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.99
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LGUG.L, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.55
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LGUG.L, currently valued at 4.22, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LGUG.L, currently valued at 18.07, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0018.07
QQQM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QQQM, currently valued at 1.89, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.89
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for QQQM, currently valued at 2.52, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.52
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for QQQM, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for QQQM, currently valued at 2.38, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.38
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for QQQM, currently valued at 8.67, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.008.67

LGUG.L vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGUG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGUG.L and QQQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.92
1.89
LGUG.L
QQQM

Dividends

LGUG.L vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

LGUG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.


TTM2023202220212020
LGUG.L
L&G US Equity UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.64%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%

Drawdowns

LGUG.L vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGUG.L drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGUG.L and QQQM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.30%
-0.23%
LGUG.L
QQQM

Volatility

LGUG.L vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUG.L) is 3.31%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that LGUG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.31%
5.13%
LGUG.L
QQQM