LGUG.L vs. FUQA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUG.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L).
LGUG.L and FUQA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LGUG.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Nov 7, 2018. FUQA.L is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity US Quality Income Index. It was launched on Mar 27, 2017. Both LGUG.L and FUQA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LGUG.L or FUQA.L.
Key characteristics
| LGUG.L | FUQA.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 19.30% | 15.87% |
| 1Y Return | 27.63% | 22.75% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.51% | 10.49% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 17.49% | 12.86% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.52 | 2.26 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.47 | 3.21 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.47 | 1.42 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.19 | 4.52 |
| Martin Ratio | 16.92 | 16.44 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.63% | 1.38% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.05% | 10.21% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.75% | -27.34% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.31% | -2.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGUG.L and FUQA.L is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LGUG.L vs. FUQA.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LGUG.L achieves a 19.30% return, which is significantly higher than FUQA.L's 15.87% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LGUG.L vs. FUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGUG.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FUQA.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LGUG.L vs. FUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUG.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LGUG.L vs. FUQA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LGUG.L nor FUQA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
LGUG.L vs. FUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGUG.L drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum FUQA.L drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGUG.L and FUQA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LGUG.L vs. FUQA.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUG.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) have volatilities of 2.29% and 2.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.