SDSI vs. CSHI

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SDSI (American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF) and CSHI (Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDSI is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 1-3 Year Government/Credit Bond Index, while CSHI is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the NONE. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SDSI returned 5.78%/yr vs 5.44%/yr for CSHI. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SDSI charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for CSHI.

Performance

SDSI vs. CSHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF (SDSI) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDSI achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than CSHI's 2.24% return.

SDSI

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 1.26%
• 6M: 1.78%
• 1Y: 5.24%
• 3Y*: 5.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHI

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 2.24%
• 6M: 2.63%
• 1Y: 5.29%
• 3Y*: 5.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDSI vs. CSHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SDSI American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF	1.26%	6.54%	5.63%	5.88%	2.05%
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	2.24%	5.05%	5.66%	6.21%	1.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SDSI and CSHI is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2022	0.07

The correlation between SDSI and CSHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (3 years) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SDSI vs. CSHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SDSI	CSHI
Communication Services	90.0%	11.2%
Industrials	7.5%	8.3%
Healthcare	2.5%	8.5%
Basic Materials	-	1.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.9%
Energy	-	3.5%
Financial Services	-	11.8%
Real Estate	-	1.9%
Technology	-	35.6%
Utilities	-	2.3%

Return for Risk

SDSI vs. CSHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDSI

SDSI Risk / Return Rank: 90
SDSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
SDSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SDSI Omega Ratio Rank: 93
SDSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
SDSI Martin Ratio Rank: 89

CSHI

CSHI Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CSHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDSI vs. CSHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF (SDSI) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SDSI	CSHI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.22	6.20	-2.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.97	11.93	-6.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.66	2.77	-1.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.41	29.39	-24.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.71	155.72	-135.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SDSI vs. CSHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDSI Sharpe Ratio is 3.22, which is lower than the CSHI Sharpe Ratio of 6.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDSI and CSHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SDSI	CSHI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.22	6.20	-2.98
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.60	4.18	-1.58

Drawdowns

SDSI vs. CSHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDSI drawdown since its inception was -1.29%, smaller than the maximum CSHI drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDSI and CSHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDSI	CSHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.29%	-1.69%	+0.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.17%	-0.18%	-0.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.29%	-1.69%	+0.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	0.00%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.24%	-0.03%	-0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.25%	0.03%	+0.22%

Volatility

SDSI vs. CSHI - Volatility Comparison

American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF (SDSI) has a higher volatility of 0.43% compared to Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) at 0.11%. This indicates that SDSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SDSI	CSHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.43%	0.11%	+0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.14%	0.53%	+0.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.64%	0.86%	+0.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.28%	1.33%	+0.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.28%	1.33%	+0.95%

SDSI vs. CSHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDSI has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than CSHI's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDSI vs. CSHI - Dividend Comparison

SDSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than CSHI's 4.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	4.91%	5.11%	5.72%	6.15%	1.52%
SDSI American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF	4.41%	4.91%	5.49%	5.37%	0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDSI and CSHI in my portfolio?

SDSI and CSHI have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SDSI or CSHI?

SDSI has higher volatility (0.43%) compared to CSHI (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDSI dropped -1.29% vs CSHI's -1.69%.

Which ETF is better, SDSI or CSHI?

On 3-year performance, SDSI leads with 5.78% vs 5.44% for CSHI. On fees, SDSI is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CSHI has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SDSI or CSHI?

Over the 3-year period, SDSI has performed better with a 5.78% return vs 5.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SDSI or CSHI?

SDSI is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for CSHI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SDSI or CSHI?

CSHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 4.41% for SDSI.

What is the main difference between SDSI and CSHI?

SDSI is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while CSHI is Ultrashort Bond. SDSI tracks Bloomberg U.S. 1-3 Year Government/Credit Bond Index, while CSHI tracks NONE. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for SDSI and 0.38% for CSHI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.20 vs 3.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.