SDOW vs. EQWL
SDOW (ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30) and EQWL (Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDOW is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average (-300%), while EQWL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 100 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDOW returned -37.72%/yr vs 14.40%/yr for EQWL. At a correlation of -0.86, they often move in opposite directions. SDOW charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EQWL.
Performance
SDOW vs. EQWL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDOW achieves a -23.82% return, which is significantly lower than EQWL's 10.97% return. Over the past 10 years, SDOW has underperformed EQWL with an annualized return of -37.72%, while EQWL has yielded a comparatively higher 14.40% annualized return.
SDOW
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -6.83%
- 6M
- -16.47%
- YTD
- -23.82%
- 1Y
- -38.80%
- 3Y*
- -33.34%
- 5Y*
- -25.64%
- 10Y*
- -37.72%
EQWL
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 8.58%
- YTD
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- 19.43%
- 3Y*
- 18.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.99%
- 10Y*
- 14.40%
SDOW vs. EQWL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDOW ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 | -23.82% | -33.94% | -25.95% | -28.78% | 4.00% | -49.00% | -66.48% | -49.54% | -0.30% | -52.26% |
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF | 10.97% | 17.61% | 19.11% | 19.48% | -11.46% | 28.29% | 13.94% | 29.54% | -6.30% | 24.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDOW and EQWL is -0.89, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | -0.86 |
The correlation between SDOW and EQWL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.93 to -0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
SDOW vs. EQWL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDOW
EQWL
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SDOW
EQWL
Basic Materials
SDOW
-
EQWL
Communication Services
SDOW
-
EQWL
Consumer Cyclical
SDOW
-
EQWL
Consumer Defensive
SDOW
-
EQWL
Energy
SDOW
-
EQWL
Healthcare
SDOW
-
EQWL
Industrials
SDOW
-
EQWL
Real Estate
SDOW
-
EQWL
Technology
SDOW
-
EQWL
Utilities
SDOW
-
EQWL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDOW vs. EQWL — Risk / Return Rank
SDOW
EQWL
SDOW vs. EQWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) and Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDOW | EQWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.33 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 2.51 | -3.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 10.52 | -12.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDOW vs. EQWL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDOW drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than EQWL's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOW and EQWL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDOW | EQWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.97% | -49.36% | -50.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.20% | -7.76% | -36.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.85% | -14.95% | -61.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.05% | -22.99% | -61.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.21% | -34.30% | -64.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -0.62% | -99.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.62% | -6.67% | -82.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.17% | 1.85% | +23.32% |
Volatility
SDOW vs. EQWL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) has a higher volatility of 9.08% compared to Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) at 3.18%. This indicates that SDOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDOW | EQWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.08% | 3.18% | +5.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.15% | 8.26% | +20.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.78% | 10.64% | +26.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.40% | 15.03% | +29.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.05% | 16.70% | +35.35% |
SDOW vs. EQWL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDOW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EQWL's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDOW vs. EQWL - Dividend Comparison
SDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, more than EQWL's 1.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF | 1.57% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 1.97% | 2.12% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 2.04% | 2.23% | 1.27% | 2.01% | 2.03% |
SDOW ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 | 5.44% | 5.80% | 8.30% | 5.38% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.17% | 1.23% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDOW and EQWL have a correlation of -0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDOW has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to EQWL (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOW dropped -99.97% vs EQWL's -49.36%.
On 10-year performance, EQWL leads with 14.40% vs -37.72% for SDOW. On fees, EQWL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EQWL has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EQWL has performed better with a 14.40% return vs -37.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EQWL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SDOW.
SDOW has the higher dividend yield at 5.44%, compared with 1.57% for EQWL.
SDOW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EQWL is Large Cap Blend Equities. SDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average (-300%), while EQWL tracks S&P 100 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SDOW and 0.25% for EQWL.
EQWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDOW and EQWL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer