PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDOG vs. INCE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDOG vs. INCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDOG achieves a 21.12% return, which is significantly higher than INCE's 16.28% return.


SDOG

1D
-0.94%
1M
3.78%
6M
10.94%
YTD
21.12%
1Y
30.19%
3Y*
16.93%
5Y*
10.90%
10Y*
9.72%
ALL TIME*
11.79%

INCE

1D
-0.13%
1M
2.10%
6M
7.42%
YTD
16.28%
1Y
26.49%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
10.70%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.28M$6.88M$3.19M
$3.61M$3.57M$3.76M

SDOG vs. INCE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDOG
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
21.12%11.12%14.70%4.19%-0.20%24.59%-0.35%24.02%-11.43%12.65%
INCE
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
16.28%15.92%10.70%13.87%-8.54%23.36%12.33%32.72%-2.14%19.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SDOG and INCE is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016

0.70

The correlation between SDOG and INCE shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.82 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SDOG vs. INCE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDOG
INCE

Consumer Cyclical

16.8%
3.1%

Technology

11.2%
3.6%

Healthcare

10.5%
7.0%

Utilities

10.5%
6.8%

Financial Services

10.3%
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

10.2%
9.3%

Energy

9.6%
5.6%

Communication Services

9.4%
2.4%

Industrials

8.3%
8.9%

Basic Materials

3.3%
2.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

SDOG
16.8%
INCE
3.1%

Technology

SDOG
11.2%
INCE
3.6%

Healthcare

SDOG
10.5%
INCE
7.0%

Utilities

SDOG
10.5%
INCE
6.8%

Financial Services

SDOG
10.3%
INCE
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

SDOG
10.2%
INCE
9.3%

Energy

SDOG
9.6%
INCE
5.6%

Communication Services

SDOG
9.4%
INCE
2.4%

Industrials

SDOG
8.3%
INCE
8.9%

Basic Materials

SDOG
3.3%
INCE
2.7%

Real Estate

SDOG

-

INCE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDOG vs. INCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SDOG
SDOG Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

INCE
INCE Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
INCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
INCE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
INCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
INCE Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SDOG vs. INCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDOGINCEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.60

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.86

5.43

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.67

20.94

-4.27

SDOG vs. INCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDOG Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the INCE Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDOG and INCE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDOG vs. INCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDOG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, which is greater than INCE's maximum drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOG and INCE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDOGINCEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.56%

-33.95%

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.24%

-4.90%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.00%

-14.01%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.84%

-18.40%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-0.13%

-1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-3.21%

-1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.27%

+0.55%

Volatility

SDOG vs. INCE - Volatility Comparison

ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) at 2.40%. This indicates that SDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDOGINCEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

2.40%

+1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.45%

6.13%

+2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

8.32%

+3.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.33%

13.26%

+2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.98%

15.59%

+3.39%

SDOG vs. INCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDOG has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than INCE's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDOG vs. INCE - Dividend Comparison

SDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than INCE's 4.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INCE
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
4.78%4.71%3.25%1.75%1.68%1.41%1.40%1.31%1.55%1.44%0.50%0.00%
SDOG
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
3.31%3.68%3.86%4.29%3.87%3.62%3.63%3.37%4.03%3.27%3.32%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDOG and INCE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDOG has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to INCE (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOG dropped -43.56% vs INCE's -33.95%.

On 5-year performance, SDOG leads with 10.90% vs 10.70% for INCE. On fees, INCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SDOG has performed better with a 10.90% return vs 10.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SDOG.

INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 3.31% for SDOG.

SDOG is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while INCE is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SDOG and 0.29% for INCE.

INCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDOG and INCE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer