SDOG vs. GURU
SDOG (ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) and GURU (Global X Guru Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDOG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while GURU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive Guru Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDOG returned 9.59%/yr vs 12.16%/yr for GURU. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDOG charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GURU.
Performance
SDOG vs. GURU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDOG achieves a 14.21% return, which is significantly higher than GURU's 7.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SDOG has underperformed GURU with an annualized return of 9.59%, while GURU has yielded a comparatively higher 12.16% annualized return.
SDOG
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 14.21%
- 6M
- 15.85%
- 1Y
- 24.70%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.48%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
GURU
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 7.06%
- 6M
- 6.09%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 23.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.41%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
SDOG vs. GURU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 14.21% | 11.12% | 14.70% | 4.19% | -0.20% | 24.59% | -0.35% | 24.02% | -11.43% | 12.65% |
GURU Global X Guru Index ETF | 7.06% | 25.43% | 23.76% | 19.28% | -27.94% | 8.19% | 25.27% | 30.99% | -6.56% | 24.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDOG and GURU is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012 | 0.71 |
The correlation between SDOG and GURU shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SDOG vs. GURU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDOG
GURU
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
SDOG
GURU
Technology
SDOG
GURU
Financial Services
SDOG
GURU
Energy
SDOG
GURU
Consumer Defensive
SDOG
GURU
Healthcare
SDOG
GURU
Utilities
SDOG
GURU
Communication Services
SDOG
GURU
Industrials
SDOG
GURU
Basic Materials
SDOG
GURU
Real Estate
SDOG
-
GURU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDOG vs. GURU — Risk / Return Rank
SDOG
GURU
SDOG vs. GURU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDOG | GURU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.31 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 2.50 | +1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.78 | 9.12 | +3.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDOG | GURU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 1.81 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.36 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.61 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.64 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
SDOG vs. GURU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDOG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, which is greater than GURU's maximum drawdown of -38.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOG and GURU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDOG | GURU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -38.50% | -5.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.24% | -11.22% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.00% | -20.73% | +4.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.84% | -38.50% | +18.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.56% | -38.50% | -5.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -1.06% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -8.67% | +3.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 3.07% | -1.13% |
Volatility
SDOG vs. GURU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) is 3.02%, while Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that SDOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GURU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDOG | GURU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | 4.33% | -1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.93% | 12.20% | -4.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.42% | 15.56% | -4.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 20.43% | -5.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 20.16% | -1.10% |
SDOG vs. GURU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDOG has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than GURU's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDOG vs. GURU - Dividend Comparison
SDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than GURU's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GURU Global X Guru Index ETF | 0.11% | 0.11% | 0.17% | 0.57% | 0.22% | 0.09% | 2.75% | 0.35% | 0.54% | 0.54% | 0.22% | 0.47% |
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.35% | 3.68% | 3.86% | 4.29% | 3.87% | 3.62% | 3.63% | 3.37% | 4.03% | 3.27% | 3.32% | 3.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDOG and GURU have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GURU has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to SDOG (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOG dropped -43.56% vs GURU's -38.50%.
On 10-year performance, GURU leads with 12.16% vs 9.59% for SDOG. On fees, SDOG is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, SDOG has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GURU has performed better with a 12.16% return vs 9.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDOG is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GURU.
SDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 0.11% for GURU.
SDOG is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while GURU is Large Cap Blend Equities. SDOG tracks S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while GURU tracks Solactive Guru Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SDOG and 0.75% for GURU.
SDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDOG and GURU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer