SDOG vs. DIVZ
SDOG (ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) and DIVZ (Opal Dividend Income ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. SDOG is passively managed, while DIVZ is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SDOG returned 8.48%/yr vs 8.36%/yr for DIVZ. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SDOG charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DIVZ.
Performance
SDOG vs. DIVZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDOG achieves a 14.21% return, which is significantly higher than DIVZ's 3.10% return.
SDOG
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 14.21%
- 6M
- 15.85%
- 1Y
- 24.70%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.48%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
DIVZ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 3.10%
- 6M
- 3.41%
- 1Y
- 10.40%
- 3Y*
- 15.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- —
SDOG vs. DIVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 14.21% | 11.12% | 14.70% | 4.19% | -0.20% | 21.43% |
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF | 3.10% | 16.72% | 18.44% | -0.51% | 3.51% | 19.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDOG and DIVZ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.85 |
The correlation between SDOG and DIVZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SDOG vs. DIVZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDOG
DIVZ
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
SDOG
DIVZ
Technology
SDOG
DIVZ
Financial Services
SDOG
DIVZ
Energy
SDOG
DIVZ
Consumer Defensive
SDOG
DIVZ
Healthcare
SDOG
DIVZ
Utilities
SDOG
DIVZ
Communication Services
SDOG
DIVZ
Industrials
SDOG
DIVZ
Basic Materials
SDOG
DIVZ
Real Estate
SDOG
-
DIVZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDOG vs. DIVZ — Risk / Return Rank
SDOG
DIVZ
SDOG vs. DIVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDOG | DIVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.19 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 1.79 | +2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.78 | 4.44 | +8.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDOG | DIVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 1.13 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.66 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.89 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
SDOG vs. DIVZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDOG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, which is greater than DIVZ's maximum drawdown of -15.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOG and DIVZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDOG | DIVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -15.42% | -28.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.24% | -5.83% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.00% | -9.52% | -6.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.84% | -15.42% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -4.50% | +3.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -3.49% | -1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 2.35% | -0.41% |
Volatility
SDOG vs. DIVZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) is 3.02%, while Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that SDOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDOG | DIVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | 3.33% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.93% | 7.02% | +0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.42% | 9.28% | +2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 12.65% | +2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 12.57% | +6.49% |
SDOG vs. DIVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDOG has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVZ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDOG vs. DIVZ - Dividend Comparison
SDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than DIVZ's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF | 2.60% | 2.60% | 2.63% | 3.66% | 3.23% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.35% | 3.68% | 3.86% | 4.29% | 3.87% | 3.62% | 3.63% | 3.37% | 4.03% | 3.27% | 3.32% | 3.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDOG and DIVZ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIVZ has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to SDOG (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOG dropped -43.56% vs DIVZ's -15.42%.
On 5-year performance, SDOG leads with 8.48% vs 8.36% for DIVZ. On fees, SDOG is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, SDOG has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SDOG has performed better with a 8.48% return vs 8.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDOG is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVZ.
SDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 2.60% for DIVZ.
They also come from different issuers: SS&C and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SDOG and 0.65% for DIVZ.
SDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDOG and DIVZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer