SDOG vs. DIV
SDOG (ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) and DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDOG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while DIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDOG returned 9.99%/yr vs 4.30%/yr for DIV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SDOG charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DIV.
Performance
SDOG vs. DIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDOG achieves a 17.13% return, which is significantly higher than DIV's 14.48% return. Over the past 10 years, SDOG has outperformed DIV with an annualized return of 9.99%, while DIV has yielded a comparatively lower 4.30% annualized return.
SDOG
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 17.13%
- 6M
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 16.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
DIV
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 14.48%
- 6M
- 13.33%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- 4.30%
SDOG vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 17.13% | 11.12% | 14.70% | 4.19% | -0.20% | 24.59% | -0.35% | 24.02% | -11.43% | 12.65% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 14.48% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDOG and DIV is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013 | 0.82 |
The correlation between SDOG and DIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SDOG vs. DIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDOG
DIV
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
SDOG
DIV
Technology
SDOG
DIV
-
Financial Services
SDOG
DIV
Healthcare
SDOG
DIV
Consumer Defensive
SDOG
DIV
Utilities
SDOG
DIV
Energy
SDOG
DIV
Communication Services
SDOG
DIV
Industrials
SDOG
DIV
Basic Materials
SDOG
DIV
Real Estate
SDOG
-
DIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDOG vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank
SDOG
DIV
SDOG vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDOG | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.26 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.25 | 3.02 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.63 | 8.43 | +5.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDOG vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDOG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, smaller than the maximum DIV drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOG and DIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDOG | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -52.74% | +9.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.24% | -5.23% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.00% | -12.33% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.84% | -21.14% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.56% | -52.74% | +9.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.73% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.91% | -7.01% | +2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 1.88% | +0.06% |
Volatility
SDOG vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) at 3.07%. This indicates that SDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDOG | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 3.07% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.02% | 7.08% | +0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.52% | 10.32% | +1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.44% | 13.69% | +1.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 17.98% | +1.08% |
SDOG vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDOG has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDOG vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison
SDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than DIV's 6.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.61% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.26% | 3.68% | 3.86% | 4.29% | 3.87% | 3.62% | 3.63% | 3.37% | 4.03% | 3.27% | 3.32% | 3.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDOG and DIV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDOG has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to DIV (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOG dropped -43.56% vs DIV's -52.74%.
On 10-year performance, SDOG leads with 9.99% vs 4.30% for DIV. On fees, SDOG is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SDOG has performed better with a 9.99% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDOG is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 3.26% for SDOG.
SDOG is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DIV is Mid Cap Value Equities. SDOG tracks S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SDOG and 0.45% for DIV.
SDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDOG and DIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer