PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDOG vs. AVLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDOG vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDOG achieves a 14.21% return, which is significantly lower than AVLV's 20.64% return.


SDOG

1D
-0.91%
1M
3.56%
YTD
14.21%
6M
15.85%
1Y
24.70%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*
9.59%

AVLV

1D
0.14%
1M
5.75%
YTD
20.64%
6M
22.01%
1Y
38.77%
3Y*
23.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDOG vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SDOG
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
14.21%11.12%14.70%4.19%-0.20%5.22%
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
20.64%15.12%17.49%17.43%-5.53%5.92%

Correlation

The correlation between SDOG and AVLV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021

0.83

The correlation between SDOG and AVLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SDOG vs. AVLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDOG
AVLV

Consumer Cyclical

15.0%
14.1%

Technology

14.1%
17.2%

Financial Services

11.0%
16.3%

Energy

9.9%
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

9.8%
7.7%

Healthcare

9.7%
5.6%

Utilities

9.4%
0.3%

Communication Services

9.0%
6.9%

Industrials

8.0%
15.4%

Basic Materials

4.1%
2.0%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SDOG
15.0%
AVLV
14.1%

Technology

SDOG
14.1%
AVLV
17.2%

Financial Services

SDOG
11.0%
AVLV
16.3%

Energy

SDOG
9.9%
AVLV
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

SDOG
9.8%
AVLV
7.7%

Healthcare

SDOG
9.7%
AVLV
5.6%

Utilities

SDOG
9.4%
AVLV
0.3%

Communication Services

SDOG
9.0%
AVLV
6.9%

Industrials

SDOG
8.0%
AVLV
15.4%

Basic Materials

SDOG
4.1%
AVLV
2.0%

Real Estate

SDOG

-

AVLV
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDOG vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDOG
SDOG Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

AVLV
AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDOG vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDOGAVLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.17

3.18

-1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.26

4.39

-1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.57

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

6.09

-2.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.78

24.39

-11.61

SDOG vs. AVLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDOG Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is lower than the AVLV Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDOG and AVLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDOGAVLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

3.18

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.86

-0.21

Drawdowns

SDOG vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDOG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, which is greater than AVLV's maximum drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOG and AVLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDOGAVLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.56%

-19.50%

-24.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.24%

-6.39%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.00%

-19.50%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

0.00%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-3.93%

-0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.59%

+0.35%

Volatility

SDOG vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison

ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) have volatilities of 3.02% and 3.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDOGAVLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

3.12%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.93%

9.04%

-1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.42%

12.29%

-0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

17.35%

-1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.06%

17.35%

+1.71%

SDOG vs. AVLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDOG has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than AVLV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDOG vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison

SDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than AVLV's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
1.07%1.33%1.58%1.85%2.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SDOG
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
3.35%3.68%3.86%4.29%3.87%3.62%3.63%3.37%4.03%3.27%3.32%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDOG and AVLV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVLV has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to SDOG (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOG dropped -43.56% vs AVLV's -19.50%.

On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 23.23% vs 16.65% for SDOG. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 23.23% return vs 16.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SDOG.

SDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 1.07% for AVLV.

SDOG tracks S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while AVLV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SDOG and 0.15% for AVLV.

AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDOG and AVLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer