SDMF vs. JUCY
SDMF (Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF) and JUCY (Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDMF is a Systematic Trend fund tracking the DBi CTA Managed Futures Index, while JUCY is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Aptus. SDMF is passively managed, while JUCY is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. SDMF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for JUCY.
Performance
SDMF vs. JUCY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SDMF
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JUCY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 3.04%
- 6M
- 3.60%
- 1Y
- 7.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDMF vs. JUCY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | 3.37% |
JUCY Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF | 1.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDMF and JUCY is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDMF vs. JUCY — Risk / Return Rank
SDMF
JUCY
SDMF vs. JUCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF (SDMF) and Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF (JUCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDMF | JUCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 1.39 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
SDMF vs. JUCY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDMF drawdown since its inception was -6.23%, which is greater than JUCY's maximum drawdown of -1.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDMF and JUCY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDMF | JUCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -1.56% | -4.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.09% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.26% | -0.32% | -1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.22% | — |
Volatility
SDMF vs. JUCY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDMF | JUCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.27% | 3.47% | +9.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.27% | 3.32% | +9.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.27% | 3.32% | +9.95% |
SDMF vs. JUCY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDMF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than JUCY's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDMF vs. JUCY - Dividend Comparison
SDMF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JUCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JUCY Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF | 8.22% | 7.98% | 7.83% | 9.31% | 0.58% |
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDMF and JUCY have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SDMF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SDMF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for JUCY.
JUCY has the higher dividend yield at 8.22%, compared with 0.00% for SDMF.
SDMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while JUCY is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Aptus. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SDMF and 0.60% for JUCY.
Find the right allocation for SDMF and JUCY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer