SDMF vs. HYZD
SDMF (Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF) and HYZD (WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SDMF is a Systematic Trend fund tracking the DBi CTA Managed Futures Index, while HYZD is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond, Zero Duration Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. SDMF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for HYZD.
Performance
SDMF vs. HYZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SDMF
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYZD
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 2.51%
- 6M
- 3.22%
- 1Y
- 7.66%
- 3Y*
- 9.28%
- 5Y*
- 6.22%
- 10Y*
- 5.57%
SDMF vs. HYZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | 3.37% |
HYZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund | 1.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDMF and HYZD is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026 | -0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDMF vs. HYZD — Risk / Return Rank
SDMF
HYZD
SDMF vs. HYZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF (SDMF) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDMF | HYZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.51 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
SDMF vs. HYZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDMF drawdown since its inception was -6.23%, smaller than the maximum HYZD drawdown of -25.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDMF and HYZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDMF | HYZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -25.66% | +19.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -8.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.02% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.26% | -2.20% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.45% | — |
Volatility
SDMF vs. HYZD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDMF | HYZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.27% | 3.15% | +10.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.27% | 6.70% | +6.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.27% | 8.57% | +4.70% |
SDMF vs. HYZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDMF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HYZD's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDMF vs. HYZD - Dividend Comparison
SDMF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HYZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund | 5.89% | 6.05% | 6.08% | 5.94% | 5.14% | 4.02% | 5.13% | 5.50% | 5.58% | 4.94% | 5.07% | 4.38% |
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDMF and HYZD have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SDMF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SDMF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for HYZD.
HYZD has the higher dividend yield at 5.89%, compared with 0.00% for SDMF.
SDMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while HYZD is High Yield Bonds. SDMF tracks DBi CTA Managed Futures Index, while HYZD tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond, Zero Duration Index. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SDMF and 0.43% for HYZD.
Find the right allocation for SDMF and HYZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer