PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDIV vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDIV vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDIV achieves a 4.37% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -7.62% return. Over the past 10 years, SDIV has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of -0.25%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.58% annualized return.


SDIV

1D
-0.41%
1M
-3.17%
YTD
4.37%
6M
5.16%
1Y
20.13%
3Y*
13.47%
5Y*
-0.45%
10Y*
-0.25%

SLV

1D
-1.81%
1M
-12.95%
YTD
-7.62%
6M
-2.33%
1Y
81.88%
3Y*
38.96%
5Y*
20.04%
10Y*
13.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDIV vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDIV
Global X SuperDividend ETF
4.37%29.12%1.77%5.46%-26.43%3.76%-20.89%13.04%-15.07%11.95%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-7.62%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SDIV and SLV is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDIV vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDIV
SDIV Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
SDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDIV vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDIVSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.27

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

1.75

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.40

3.68

+4.72

SDIV vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDIV and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDIV vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDIV drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDIV and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDIVSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.90%

-76.28%

+19.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-45.40%

+38.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.64%

-45.40%

+26.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.32%

-45.40%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.90%

-45.40%

-11.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.01%

-43.65%

+24.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.58%

-44.65%

+26.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

21.52%

-19.23%

Volatility

SDIV vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) is 4.26%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 14.09%. This indicates that SDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDIVSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

14.09%

-9.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.91%

59.18%

-49.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

60.10%

-47.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.87%

36.50%

-19.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.97%

32.04%

-13.07%

SDIV vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDIV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDIV vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

SDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.38%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDIV
Global X SuperDividend ETF
9.38%9.59%11.33%11.73%14.17%8.95%7.96%8.73%9.22%6.66%6.95%7.33%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDIV and SLV have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (14.09%) compared to SDIV (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDIV dropped -56.90% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 13.58% vs -0.25% for SDIV. On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 13.58% return vs -0.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SDIV.

SDIV has the higher dividend yield at 9.38%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

SDIV is categorized as Global Equities, while SLV is Silver. SDIV tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SDIV and 0.50% for SLV.

SDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDIV and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer