SDIV vs. SIL

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SDIV (Global X SuperDividend ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global SuperDividend Index, while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDIV returned -0.29%/yr vs 5.66%/yr for SIL. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SDIV charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.

Performance

SDIV vs. SIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDIV achieves a 8.49% return, which is significantly higher than SIL's -9.13% return. Over the past 10 years, SDIV has underperformed SIL with an annualized return of -0.29%, while SIL has yielded a comparatively higher 5.66% annualized return.

SDIV

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 2.38%
• 6M: 1.25%
• YTD: 8.49%
• 1Y: 19.40%
• 3Y*: 13.97%
• 5Y*: 1.38%
• 10Y*: -0.29%
• ALL TIME*: 1.26%

SIL

• 1D: 2.77%
• 1M: -5.50%
• 6M: -18.67%
• YTD: -9.13%
• 1Y: 61.23%
• 3Y*: 44.54%
• 5Y*: 13.97%
• 10Y*: 5.66%
• ALL TIME*: 4.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF	$7.65M	$8.97M	$10.68M
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	$64.85M	$66.09M	$119.11M

SDIV vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF	8.49%	29.12%	1.77%	5.46%	-26.43%	3.76%	-20.89%	13.04%	-15.07%	11.95%
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	-9.13%	166.16%	14.62%	1.31%	-22.83%	-18.35%	40.30%	34.78%	-22.42%	1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SDIV and SIL is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.48
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011	0.41

SDIV vs. SIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SDIV	SIL
Real Estate	33.0%	-
Financial Services	15.5%	-
Energy	13.3%	-
Industrials	10.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.3%	-
Basic Materials	3.7%	99.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	0.1%
Communication Services	3.3%	-
Technology	2.8%	-
Utilities	1.0%	-
Healthcare	0.9%	-

Return for Risk

SDIV vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SDIV

SDIV Risk / Return Rank: 66
SDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
SDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
SDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 65
SDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
SDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 59

SIL

SIL Risk / Return Rank: 42
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SDIV vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SDIV	SIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	1.15	+0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	1.61	+0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.21	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	1.56	+1.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.30	3.26	+4.03

SDIV vs. SIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the SIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDIV and SIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SDIV vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDIV drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDIV and SIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDIV	SIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.90%	-82.99%	+26.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.35%	-39.41%	+32.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.64%	-39.41%	+20.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.69%	-47.91%	+9.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.90%	-63.04%	+6.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.82%	-35.70%	+19.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.57%	-51.26%	+32.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	18.82%	-16.15%

Volatility

SDIV vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) is 2.62%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that SDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SDIV	SIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.62%	12.95%	-10.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.62%	41.10%	-31.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.26%	53.55%	-41.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.80%	40.15%	-23.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.88%	39.82%	-20.94%

SDIV vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDIV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDIV vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison

SDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%, more than SIL's 1.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF	9.05%	9.59%	11.33%	11.73%	14.17%	8.95%	7.96%	8.73%	9.22%	6.66%	6.95%	7.33%
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	1.34%	1.18%	2.40%	0.59%	0.48%	1.59%	1.92%	1.53%	1.21%	0.02%	3.34%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDIV and SIL in my portfolio?

SDIV and SIL have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SDIV or SIL?

SIL has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to SDIV (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDIV dropped -56.90% vs SIL's -82.99%.

Which ETF is better, SDIV or SIL?

On 10-year performance, SIL leads with 5.66% vs -0.29% for SDIV. On fees, SDIV is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SDIV or SIL?

Over the 10-year period, SIL has performed better with a 5.66% return vs -0.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SDIV or SIL?

SDIV is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SDIV or SIL?

SDIV has the higher dividend yield at 9.05%, compared with 1.34% for SIL.

What is the main difference between SDIV and SIL?

SDIV is categorized as Global Equities, while SIL is Silver. SDIV tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SDIV and 0.65% for SIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.