PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDIV vs. GBDV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDIV vs. GBDV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SDIV is traded in USD, while GBDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GBDV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SDIV having a 7.01% return and GBDV.L slightly lower at 6.77%. Over the past 10 years, SDIV has underperformed GBDV.L with an annualized return of -0.02%, while GBDV.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.20% annualized return.


SDIV

1D
0.98%
1M
-4.19%
YTD
7.01%
6M
6.92%
1Y
25.89%
3Y*
16.32%
5Y*
-0.65%
10Y*
-0.02%

GBDV.L

1D
0.61%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
6.77%
6M
8.18%
1Y
18.09%
3Y*
15.38%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
7.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDIV vs. GBDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDIV
Global X SuperDividend ETF
7.01%29.12%1.77%5.46%-26.43%3.76%-20.89%13.04%-15.07%11.95%
GBDV.L
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
6.77%18.36%7.94%7.28%-5.88%16.35%-8.98%21.54%-8.15%19.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SDIV and GBDV.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2013

0.63

The correlation between SDIV and GBDV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SDIV vs. GBDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDIV
GBDV.L

Real Estate

36.2%
12.1%

Energy

18.4%
7.3%

Industrials

14.3%
11.5%

Financial Services

8.9%
24.9%

Communication Services

6.1%
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
8.0%

Basic Materials

2.8%
2.0%

Technology

1.6%
2.2%

Healthcare

1.4%
4.2%

Utilities

1.1%
15.9%

Real Estate

SDIV
36.2%
GBDV.L
12.1%

Energy

SDIV
18.4%
GBDV.L
7.3%

Industrials

SDIV
14.3%
GBDV.L
11.5%

Financial Services

SDIV
8.9%
GBDV.L
24.9%

Communication Services

SDIV
6.1%
GBDV.L
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SDIV
5.5%
GBDV.L
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

SDIV
3.7%
GBDV.L
8.0%

Basic Materials

SDIV
2.8%
GBDV.L
2.0%

Technology

SDIV
1.6%
GBDV.L
2.2%

Healthcare

SDIV
1.4%
GBDV.L
4.2%

Utilities

SDIV
1.1%
GBDV.L
15.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDIV vs. GBDV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDIV
SDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

GBDV.L
GBDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GBDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDIV vs. GBDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDIVGBDV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.33

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

2.40

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.69

7.39

+5.30

SDIV vs. GBDV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the GBDV.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDIV and GBDV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDIVGBDV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

1.83

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.45

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

0.46

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.51

-0.45

Drawdowns

SDIV vs. GBDV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDIV drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, which is greater than GBDV.L's maximum drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDIV and GBDV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDIVGBDV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.90%

-41.93%

-14.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-7.52%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.64%

-12.05%

-6.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.94%

-20.80%

-21.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.90%

-41.93%

-14.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.97%

-2.58%

-14.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.59%

-5.81%

-12.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

2.44%

-0.39%

Volatility

SDIV vs. GBDV.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) at 2.74%. This indicates that SDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDIVGBDV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

2.74%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.68%

6.93%

+2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.50%

9.87%

+2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.86%

13.90%

+2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.97%

15.80%

+3.17%

SDIV vs. GBDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDIV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than GBDV.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDIV vs. GBDV.L - Dividend Comparison

SDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.14%, more than GBDV.L's 4.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBDV.L
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
4.50%4.91%4.49%4.87%5.05%4.26%4.41%4.41%5.18%4.26%4.74%5.72%
SDIV
Global X SuperDividend ETF
9.14%9.59%11.33%11.73%14.17%8.95%7.96%8.73%9.22%6.66%6.95%7.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDIV and GBDV.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GBDV.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBDV.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SDIV.

SDIV tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend Index, while GBDV.L tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SDIV and 0.45% for GBDV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDIV and GBDV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer