PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBDV.L vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GBDV.L vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GBDV.L vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBDV.L
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
4.45%10.06%9.77%1.90%5.38%17.41%-11.68%16.85%-2.63%9.30%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
1.06%0.32%21.58%5.55%-1.60%20.72%-3.48%16.79%-0.53%6.42%
Different Trading Currencies

GBDV.L is traded in GBP, while XYLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XYLD values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBDV.L achieves a 4.45% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's 1.06% return. Over the past 10 years, GBDV.L has underperformed XYLD with an annualized return of 8.07%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.69% annualized return.


GBDV.L

1D
0.32%
1M
-3.39%
YTD
4.45%
6M
7.81%
1Y
13.67%
3Y*
10.34%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
8.07%

XYLD

1D
0.23%
1M
-1.43%
YTD
1.06%
6M
7.38%
1Y
8.20%
3Y*
7.76%
5Y*
7.96%
10Y*
8.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GBDV.L vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBDV.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GBDV.L vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBDV.L
GBDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GBDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBDV.L vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBDV.LXYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

0.56

+0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.63

0.91

+0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.15

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

0.94

+1.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.40

2.94

+4.46

GBDV.L vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBDV.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBDV.L and XYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBDV.LXYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

0.56

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.67

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.56

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.61

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between GBDV.L and XYLD is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GBDV.L vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

GBDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than XYLD's 10.93% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBDV.L
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
4.62%4.91%4.49%4.87%5.05%4.26%4.41%4.41%5.18%4.26%4.74%5.72%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.93%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Drawdowns

GBDV.L vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBDV.L drawdown since its inception was -34.77%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -26.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBDV.L and XYLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GBDV.LXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.77%

-33.46%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-10.14%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.84%

-18.66%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.77%

-33.46%

-1.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.01%

-2.94%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-3.76%

-1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.73%

+0.18%

Volatility

GBDV.L vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) have volatilities of 3.40% and 3.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GBDV.LXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

3.46%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.00%

6.49%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.13%

14.67%

-3.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.80%

12.00%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.19%

15.59%

-1.40%