SDIV vs. CEFD
SDIV (Global X SuperDividend ETF) and CEFD (ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - SDIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global SuperDividend Index, while CEFD is a fund fund tracking the S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index (150%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SDIV returned -0.84%/yr vs 3.13%/yr for CEFD. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDIV charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CEFD.
Performance
SDIV vs. CEFD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SDIV having a 5.97% return and CEFD slightly higher at 6.26%.
SDIV
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- 5.97%
- 6M
- 6.19%
- 1Y
- 25.09%
- 3Y*
- 15.75%
- 5Y*
- -0.84%
- 10Y*
- -0.07%
CEFD
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 6.26%
- 6M
- 6.56%
- 1Y
- 18.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- —
SDIV vs. CEFD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF | 5.97% | 29.12% | 1.77% | 5.46% | -26.43% | 3.76% | 17.48% |
CEFD ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN | 6.26% | 14.15% | 20.06% | 8.36% | -28.93% | 22.09% | 21.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDIV and CEFD is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.62 |
The correlation between SDIV and CEFD shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDIV vs. CEFD — Risk / Return Rank
SDIV
CEFD
SDIV vs. CEFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN (CEFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDIV | CEFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.29 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 1.47 | +1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.41 | 6.84 | +5.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDIV | CEFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 1.43 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.18 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.52 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
SDIV vs. CEFD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDIV drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, which is greater than CEFD's maximum drawdown of -36.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDIV and CEFD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDIV | CEFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.90% | -36.95% | -19.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.35% | -12.51% | +5.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.64% | -21.76% | +3.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.94% | -36.95% | -4.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.77% | -1.14% | -16.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.59% | -11.72% | -6.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 2.68% | -0.65% |
Volatility
SDIV vs. CEFD - Volatility Comparison
Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN (CEFD) have volatilities of 4.21% and 4.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDIV | CEFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 4.05% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.64% | 11.27% | -1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.47% | 12.86% | -0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 17.93% | -1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 17.31% | +1.66% |
SDIV vs. CEFD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDIV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDIV vs. CEFD - Dividend Comparison
SDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.02%, less than CEFD's 14.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFD ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Closed-End Fund Index ETN | 14.58% | 14.88% | 13.90% | 14.76% | 16.56% | 10.31% | 5.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF | 10.02% | 9.59% | 11.33% | 11.73% | 14.17% | 8.95% | 7.96% | 8.73% | 9.22% | 6.66% | 6.95% | 7.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDIV and CEFD have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDIV has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to CEFD (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDIV dropped -56.90% vs CEFD's -36.95%.
On 5-year performance, CEFD leads with 3.13% vs -0.84% for SDIV. On fees, SDIV is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, CEFD has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CEFD has performed better with a 3.13% return vs -0.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDIV is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CEFD.
CEFD has the higher dividend yield at 14.58%, compared with 10.02% for SDIV.
SDIV tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend Index, while CEFD tracks S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index (150%). They also come from different issuers: Global X and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SDIV and 0.95% for CEFD.
SDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDIV and CEFD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer