SDIV vs. ACWV

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SDIV (Global X SuperDividend ETF) and ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Global Equities funds - SDIV tracks the Solactive Global SuperDividend Index while ACWV tracks the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDIV returned -0.29%/yr vs 7.22%/yr for ACWV. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SDIV charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACWV.

Performance

SDIV vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDIV achieves a 8.49% return, which is significantly higher than ACWV's 5.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SDIV has underperformed ACWV with an annualized return of -0.29%, while ACWV has yielded a comparatively higher 7.22% annualized return.

SDIV

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 2.38%
• 6M: 1.25%
• YTD: 8.49%
• 1Y: 19.40%
• 3Y*: 13.97%
• 5Y*: 1.38%
• 10Y*: -0.29%
• ALL TIME*: 1.26%

ACWV

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 2.00%
• 6M: 3.53%
• YTD: 5.77%
• 1Y: 8.71%
• 3Y*: 10.89%
• 5Y*: 5.71%
• 10Y*: 7.22%
• ALL TIME*: 8.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	$13.15M	$11.49M	$12.64M
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF	$7.65M	$8.97M	$10.68M

SDIV vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF	8.49%	29.12%	1.77%	5.46%	-26.43%	3.76%	-20.89%	13.04%	-15.07%	11.95%
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	5.77%	11.04%	11.38%	8.23%	-10.36%	13.97%	3.04%	21.04%	-1.42%	18.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SDIV and ACWV is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011	0.69

The correlation between SDIV and ACWV shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SDIV vs. ACWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SDIV	ACWV
Real Estate	33.0%	0.6%
Financial Services	15.5%	13.5%
Energy	13.3%	3.5%
Industrials	10.4%	8.1%
Consumer Cyclical	5.3%	5.3%
Basic Materials	3.7%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	9.7%
Communication Services	3.3%	11.3%
Technology	2.8%	25.3%
Utilities	1.0%	7.5%
Healthcare	0.9%	13.8%

Return for Risk

SDIV vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SDIV

SDIV Risk / Return Rank: 66
SDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
SDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
SDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 65
SDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
SDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 59

ACWV

ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 41
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 42
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SDIV vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SDIV	ACWV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	1.09	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	1.63	+0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.20	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	1.37	+1.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.30	3.90	+3.40

SDIV vs. ACWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the ACWV Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDIV and ACWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SDIV vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDIV drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, which is greater than ACWV's maximum drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDIV and ACWV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDIV	ACWV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.90%	-28.82%	-28.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.35%	-6.37%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.64%	-7.56%	-11.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.69%	-18.14%	-20.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.90%	-28.82%	-28.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.82%	-0.34%	-15.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.57%	-3.10%	-15.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	2.24%	+0.43%

Volatility

SDIV vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison

Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) has a higher volatility of 2.62% compared to iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) at 2.32%. This indicates that SDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SDIV	ACWV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.62%	2.32%	+0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.62%	6.41%	+3.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.26%	8.05%	+4.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.80%	10.30%	+6.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.88%	12.30%	+6.58%

SDIV vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDIV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDIV vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison

SDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%, more than ACWV's 1.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	1.90%	2.09%	2.33%	2.41%	2.18%	1.92%	1.77%	2.54%	2.32%	2.04%	2.56%	2.28%
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF	9.05%	9.59%	11.33%	11.73%	14.17%	8.95%	7.96%	8.73%	9.22%	6.66%	6.95%	7.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDIV and ACWV in my portfolio?

SDIV and ACWV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SDIV or ACWV?

SDIV has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to ACWV (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDIV dropped -56.90% vs ACWV's -28.82%.

Which ETF is better, SDIV or ACWV?

On 10-year performance, ACWV leads with 7.22% vs -0.29% for SDIV. On fees, ACWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SDIV or ACWV?

Over the 10-year period, ACWV has performed better with a 7.22% return vs -0.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SDIV or ACWV?

ACWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SDIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SDIV or ACWV?

SDIV has the higher dividend yield at 9.05%, compared with 1.90% for ACWV.

What is the main difference between SDIV and ACWV?

SDIV tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend Index, while ACWV tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SDIV and 0.20% for ACWV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.