SDG vs. WRND
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF (SDG) and IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND).
SDG and WRND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SDG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Sustainable Development Index. It was launched on Apr 20, 2016. WRND is a passively managed fund by IndexIQ that tracks the performance of the IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Feb 8, 2022. Both SDG and WRND are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SDG vs. WRND - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SDG vs. WRND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDG iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF | -0.32% | 20.19% | -10.09% | 4.59% | -7.46% |
WRND IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF | -3.11% | 27.72% | 13.46% | 34.85% | -19.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDG achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly higher than WRND's -3.11% return.
SDG
- 1D
- 3.01%
- 1M
- -3.35%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 18.43%
- 3Y*
- 3.93%
- 5Y*
- -0.71%
- 10Y*
- —
WRND
- 1D
- 4.07%
- 1M
- -6.90%
- YTD
- -3.11%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 22.97%
- 3Y*
- 17.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SDG vs. WRND - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than WRND's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SDG vs. WRND — Risk / Return Rank
SDG
WRND
SDG vs. WRND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF (SDG) and IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDG | WRND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 1.12 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 1.67 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 1.75 | +0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.92 | 6.86 | +0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDG | WRND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 1.12 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.58 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between SDG and WRND is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SDG vs. WRND - Dividend Comparison
SDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than WRND's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDG iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF | 2.00% | 2.00% | 1.95% | 1.77% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 0.97% | 1.39% | 2.47% | 2.54% | 1.34% |
WRND IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF | 1.18% | 1.29% | 1.15% | 2.06% | 2.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SDG vs. WRND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDG drawdown since its inception was -30.35%, which is greater than WRND's maximum drawdown of -27.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDG and WRND.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDG | WRND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.35% | -27.16% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.98% | -12.75% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.06% | -8.87% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.77% | -6.16% | -3.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 3.26% | -0.70% |
Volatility
SDG vs. WRND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF (SDG) is 7.01%, while IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) has a volatility of 8.10%. This indicates that SDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WRND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SDG | WRND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 8.10% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.78% | 13.20% | -2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.42% | 20.59% | -4.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.49% | 18.78% | -3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 18.78% | -2.12% |