SDEM vs. TDEC
SDEM (Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF) and TDEC (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December) are both exchange-traded funds - SDEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend, while TDEC is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SDEM returned 30.03% vs 24.15% for TDEC. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDEM charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TDEC.
Performance
SDEM vs. TDEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDEM achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly higher than TDEC's 9.14% return.
SDEM
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 10.30%
- 1Y
- 30.03%
- 3Y*
- 19.61%
- 5Y*
- 4.14%
- 10Y*
- 4.84%
TDEC
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 9.14%
- 6M
- 11.08%
- 1Y
- 24.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDEM vs. TDEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF | 10.35% | 32.01% | 0.04% |
TDEC FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December | 9.14% | 21.39% | -0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDEM and TDEC is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2024 | 0.72 |
The correlation between SDEM and TDEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDEM vs. TDEC — Risk / Return Rank
SDEM
TDEC
SDEM vs. TDEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDEM | TDEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.54 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 2.97 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.64 | 13.07 | -1.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDEM | TDEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 2.41 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 1.81 | -1.62 |
Drawdowns
SDEM vs. TDEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDEM drawdown since its inception was -47.38%, which is greater than TDEC's maximum drawdown of -10.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDEM and TDEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDEM | TDEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.38% | -10.30% | -37.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -8.16% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.20% | -0.33% | -3.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.71% | -1.04% | -19.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 1.85% | +0.74% |
Volatility
SDEM vs. TDEC - Volatility Comparison
Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) at 2.81%. This indicates that SDEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDEM | TDEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 2.81% | +2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.14% | 9.02% | +2.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 10.09% | +3.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 11.75% | +5.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 11.75% | +7.47% |
SDEM vs. TDEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDEM has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than TDEC's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDEM vs. TDEC - Dividend Comparison
SDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.42%, while TDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF | 5.42% | 5.27% | 7.28% | 7.50% | 8.86% | 8.14% | 6.30% | 6.47% | 6.55% | 5.01% | 5.06% | 6.14% |
TDEC FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDEM and TDEC have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDEM has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to TDEC (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDEM dropped -47.38% vs TDEC's -10.30%.
On 1-year performance, SDEM leads with 30.03% vs 24.15% for TDEC. On fees, SDEM is cheaper at 0.67% per year. On volatility, TDEC has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SDEM has performed better with a 30.03% return vs 24.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDEM is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TDEC.
SDEM has the higher dividend yield at 5.42%, compared with 0.00% for TDEC.
SDEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TDEC is Defined Outcome. SDEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend, while TDEC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: Global X and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for SDEM and 0.95% for TDEC.
TDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDEM and TDEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer