PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDEM vs. TDEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDEM vs. TDEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDEM achieves a 14.03% return, which is significantly higher than TDEC's 9.71% return.


SDEM

1D
-0.52%
1M
2.58%
6M
4.55%
YTD
14.03%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
6.07%
10Y*
4.09%
ALL TIME*
3.94%

TDEC

1D
0.28%
1M
1.05%
6M
5.71%
YTD
9.71%
1Y
18.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$94.66K$95.29K$111.33K
$45.14K$70.00K$193.92K

SDEM vs. TDEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SDEM and TDEC is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024

0.70

The correlation between SDEM and TDEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDEM vs. TDEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SDEM
SDEM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

TDEC
TDEC Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
TDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SDEM vs. TDEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDEMTDECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.36

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

2.28

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.90

9.25

-0.35

SDEM vs. TDEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the TDEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDEM and TDEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDEM vs. TDEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDEM drawdown since its inception was -47.38%, which is greater than TDEC's maximum drawdown of -10.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDEM and TDEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDEMTDECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.38%

-10.30%

-37.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-8.16%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-0.26%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.44%

-1.11%

-19.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

2.01%

+1.02%

Volatility

SDEM vs. TDEC - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) have volatilities of 3.35% and 3.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDEMTDECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

3.32%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.49%

10.28%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.22%

11.05%

+3.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

11.95%

+5.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

11.95%

+7.10%

SDEM vs. TDEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDEM has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than TDEC's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDEM vs. TDEC - Dividend Comparison

SDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, while TDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDEM
Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF
4.96%5.27%7.28%7.50%8.86%8.14%6.30%6.47%6.55%5.01%5.06%6.14%
TDEC
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDEM and TDEC have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDEM has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to TDEC (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDEM dropped -47.38% vs TDEC's -10.30%.

On 1-year performance, SDEM leads with 26.92% vs 18.52% for TDEC. On fees, SDEM is cheaper at 0.67% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SDEM has performed better with a 26.92% return vs 18.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SDEM is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TDEC.

SDEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 0.00% for TDEC.

SDEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TDEC is Defined Outcome. SDEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend, while TDEC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: Global X and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for SDEM and 0.95% for TDEC.

SDEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDEM and TDEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer