PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDEM vs. PDI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDEM vs. PDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDEM achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly higher than PDI's -0.81% return. Over the past 10 years, SDEM has underperformed PDI with an annualized return of 5.26%, while PDI has yielded a comparatively higher 7.55% annualized return.


SDEM

1D
0.93%
1M
0.85%
YTD
11.17%
6M
12.41%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*
5.26%

PDI

1D
-0.79%
1M
-3.50%
YTD
-0.81%
6M
-0.75%
1Y
0.14%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
7.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDEM vs. PDI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDEM
Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF
11.17%32.01%4.02%12.64%-21.53%2.11%-11.13%17.56%-17.40%16.57%
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
-0.81%11.03%17.18%11.99%-16.99%7.81%-9.96%22.23%7.35%18.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SDEM and PDI is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2015

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDEM vs. PDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDEM
SDEM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

PDI
PDI Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDI Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDI Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDEM vs. PDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDEMPDIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.01

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

0.01

+3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.28

0.03

+10.25

SDEM vs. PDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the PDI Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDEM and PDI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDEM vs. PDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDEM drawdown since its inception was -47.38%, roughly equal to the maximum PDI drawdown of -46.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDEM and PDI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDEMPDIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.38%

-46.47%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-10.95%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-17.55%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.25%

-27.19%

-9.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.38%

-46.47%

-0.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.49%

-8.56%

+5.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.66%

-6.22%

-14.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

5.09%

-2.35%

Volatility

SDEM vs. PDI - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) at 3.31%. This indicates that SDEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDEMPDIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

3.31%

+1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.48%

8.27%

+3.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.91%

11.31%

+2.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

15.53%

+1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.22%

19.04%

+0.18%

Dividends

SDEM vs. PDI - Dividend Comparison

SDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, less than PDI's 16.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
16.24%14.94%14.43%14.74%17.84%10.21%10.01%9.45%10.78%8.81%14.79%18.70%
SDEM
Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF
4.99%5.27%7.28%7.50%8.86%8.14%6.30%6.47%6.55%5.01%5.06%6.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDEM and PDI have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDEM has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to PDI (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDEM dropped -47.38% vs PDI's -46.47%.

SDEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDEM and PDI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer