PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDEM vs. EWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDEM vs. EWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF (EWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDEM achieves a 14.03% return, which is significantly higher than EWX's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, SDEM has underperformed EWX with an annualized return of 4.09%, while EWX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.21% annualized return.


SDEM

1D
-0.52%
1M
2.58%
6M
4.55%
YTD
14.03%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
6.07%
10Y*
4.09%
ALL TIME*
3.94%

EWX

1D
0.07%
1M
-5.47%
6M
4.16%
YTD
8.19%
1Y
13.97%
3Y*
12.19%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*
8.21%
ALL TIME*
4.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.73M$1.63M$1.65M
$94.66K$95.29K$111.33K

SDEM vs. EWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDEM
Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF
14.03%32.01%4.02%12.64%-21.53%2.11%-11.13%17.56%-17.40%16.57%
EWX
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF
8.19%15.46%6.81%18.13%-15.00%18.15%14.84%15.59%-18.75%34.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SDEM and EWX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2015

0.75

The correlation between SDEM and EWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

SDEM vs. EWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDEM
EWX

Financial Services

27.7%
7.4%

Industrials

10.2%
19.8%

Real Estate

7.7%
5.7%

Utilities

7.2%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
10.5%

Communication Services

5.5%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
4.9%

Basic Materials

5.2%
10.8%

Energy

3.6%
1.7%

Technology

2.5%
28.1%

Healthcare

1.9%
6.6%

Financial Services

SDEM
27.7%
EWX
7.4%

Industrials

SDEM
10.2%
EWX
19.8%

Real Estate

SDEM
7.7%
EWX
5.7%

Utilities

SDEM
7.2%
EWX
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SDEM
6.0%
EWX
10.5%

Communication Services

SDEM
5.5%
EWX
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

SDEM
5.4%
EWX
4.9%

Basic Materials

SDEM
5.2%
EWX
10.8%

Energy

SDEM
3.6%
EWX
1.7%

Technology

SDEM
2.5%
EWX
28.1%

Healthcare

SDEM
1.9%
EWX
6.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDEM vs. EWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SDEM
SDEM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

EWX
EWX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
EWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
EWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SDEM vs. EWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF (EWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDEMEWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.15

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

1.04

+1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.90

3.73

+5.17

SDEM vs. EWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the EWX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDEM and EWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDEM vs. EWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDEM drawdown since its inception was -47.38%, smaller than the maximum EWX drawdown of -63.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDEM and EWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDEMEWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.38%

-63.90%

+16.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-13.47%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-21.37%

+9.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.08%

-24.06%

-12.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.38%

-43.00%

-4.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-7.79%

+6.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.44%

-13.10%

-7.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

3.76%

-0.73%

Volatility

SDEM vs. EWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) is 3.35%, while SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF (EWX) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that SDEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDEMEWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

6.99%

-3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.49%

15.79%

-4.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.22%

17.57%

-3.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

15.82%

+1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

17.28%

+1.77%

SDEM vs. EWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDEM has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than EWX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDEM vs. EWX - Dividend Comparison

SDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than EWX's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWX
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF
2.62%2.91%2.90%2.32%3.00%2.77%2.24%2.73%3.26%2.30%2.46%3.04%
SDEM
Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF
4.96%5.27%7.28%7.50%8.86%8.14%6.30%6.47%6.55%5.01%5.06%6.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDEM and EWX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWX has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to SDEM (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDEM dropped -47.38% vs EWX's -63.90%.

On 10-year performance, EWX leads with 8.21% vs 4.09% for SDEM. On fees, EWX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, SDEM has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWX has performed better with a 8.21% return vs 4.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for SDEM.

SDEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 2.62% for EWX.

SDEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend, while EWX tracks S&P Emerging Markets Under USD2 Billion Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for SDEM and 0.65% for EWX.

SDEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDEM and EWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer