SDD vs. SH
SDD (ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600) and SH (ProShares Short S&P500) are both Inverse Equities funds from ProShares - SDD tracks the S&P Small Cap 600 (-200%) while SH tracks the S&P 500 Index (-100% daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDD returned -26.98%/yr vs -12.62%/yr for SH. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SH.
Performance
SDD vs. SH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDD achieves a -32.06% return, which is significantly lower than SH's -7.86% return. Over the past 10 years, SDD has underperformed SH with an annualized return of -26.98%, while SH has yielded a comparatively higher -12.62% annualized return.
SDD
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- 6M
- -25.07%
- YTD
- -32.06%
- 1Y
- -40.76%
- 3Y*
- -24.65%
- 5Y*
- -17.22%
- 10Y*
- -26.98%
SH
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- 6M
- -6.38%
- YTD
- -7.86%
- 1Y
- -13.68%
- 3Y*
- -12.12%
- 5Y*
- -8.40%
- 10Y*
- -12.62%
SDD vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDD ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 | -32.06% | -14.69% | -13.60% | -25.99% | 20.50% | -46.57% | -55.11% | -36.30% | 14.10% | -25.45% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -7.86% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -14.80% | 18.98% | -24.21% | -25.09% | -22.12% | 4.93% | -17.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDD and SH is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2007 | 0.78 |
The correlation between SDD and SH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDD vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank
SDD
SH
SDD vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 (SDD) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDD | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.83 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | -0.83 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.45 | -1.60 | +0.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDD vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDD drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than SH's maximum drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDD and SH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDD | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -94.66% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.71% | -16.06% | -31.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.10% | -38.82% | -30.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.26% | -44.53% | -26.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.11% | -74.80% | -21.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.94% | -94.61% | -5.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.96% | -67.85% | -19.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.29% | 8.36% | +18.93% |
Volatility
SDD vs. SH - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 (SDD) has a higher volatility of 8.95% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 4.37%. This indicates that SDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDD | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.95% | 4.37% | +4.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.79% | 9.92% | +14.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.96% | 12.47% | +23.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.10% | 16.95% | +26.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.02% | 17.99% | +27.03% |
SDD vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SH's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDD vs. SH - Dividend Comparison
SDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, more than SH's 4.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDD ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 | 6.33% | 5.07% | 4.34% | 3.84% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.20% | 0.52% | 0.00% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.24% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDD and SH have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDD has higher volatility (8.95%) compared to SH (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDD dropped -99.94% vs SH's -94.66%.
On 10-year performance, SH leads with -12.62% vs -26.98% for SDD. On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SH has performed better with a -12.62% return vs -26.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SH is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SDD.
SDD has the higher dividend yield at 6.33%, compared with 4.24% for SH.
SDD tracks S&P Small Cap 600 (-200%), while SH tracks S&P 500 Index (-100% daily). Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SDD and 0.89% for SH.
SH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.07 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDD and SH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer