SDD vs. PLTZ
SDD (ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600) and PLTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. SDD is passively managed, while PLTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, SDD returned -40.76% vs -43.98% for PLTZ. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for PLTZ.
Performance
SDD vs. PLTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDD achieves a -32.06% return, which is significantly lower than PLTZ's 20.05% return.
SDD
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- 6M
- -25.07%
- YTD
- -32.06%
- 1Y
- -40.76%
- 3Y*
- -24.65%
- 5Y*
- -17.22%
- 10Y*
- -26.98%
PLTZ
- 1D
- 3.51%
- 1M
- -5.67%
- 6M
- 21.92%
- YTD
- 20.05%
- 1Y
- -43.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDD vs. PLTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SDD ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 | -32.06% | -23.13% |
PLTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF | 20.05% | -67.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDD and PLTZ is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDD vs. PLTZ — Risk / Return Rank
SDD
PLTZ
SDD vs. PLTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 (SDD) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDD | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.99 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | -0.72 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.45 | -1.02 | -0.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDD vs. PLTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDD drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than PLTZ's maximum drawdown of -72.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDD and PLTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDD | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -72.51% | -27.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.71% | -61.05% | +13.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.94% | -60.47% | -39.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.96% | -55.68% | -31.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.29% | 43.10% | -15.81% |
Volatility
SDD vs. PLTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 (SDD) is 8.95%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ) has a volatility of 33.35%. This indicates that SDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDD | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.95% | 33.35% | -24.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.79% | 78.60% | -53.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.96% | 103.02% | -67.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.10% | 102.59% | -59.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.02% | 102.59% | -57.57% |
SDD vs. PLTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTZ's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDD vs. PLTZ - Dividend Comparison
SDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, while PLTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDD ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 | 6.33% | 5.07% | 4.34% | 3.84% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.20% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDD and PLTZ have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTZ has higher volatility (33.35%) compared to SDD (8.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDD dropped -99.94% vs PLTZ's -72.51%.
On 1-year performance, SDD leads with -40.76% vs -43.98% for PLTZ. On fees, SDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SDD has been the lower-risk option at 8.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SDD has performed better with a -40.76% return vs -43.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for PLTZ.
SDD has the higher dividend yield at 6.33%, compared with 0.00% for PLTZ.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SDD and 1.29% for PLTZ.
PLTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDD and PLTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer