PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCZ vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCZ vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCZ achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 14.29% return. Over the past 10 years, SCZ has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 8.64%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.78% annualized return.


SCZ

1D
0.47%
1M
1.01%
YTD
9.70%
6M
11.43%
1Y
23.50%
3Y*
15.38%
5Y*
4.99%
10Y*
8.64%

VTV

1D
0.93%
1M
5.04%
YTD
14.29%
6M
13.99%
1Y
27.90%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
11.76%
10Y*
12.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCZ vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
9.70%32.08%1.52%12.98%-21.27%10.12%11.71%24.68%-17.64%32.72%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
14.29%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SCZ and VTV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2007

0.74

The correlation between SCZ and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCZ vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCZ
VTV

Industrials

24.2%
14.0%

Financial Services

12.5%
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
4.0%

Technology

10.8%
13.4%

Basic Materials

10.2%
3.1%

Real Estate

9.9%
2.8%

Healthcare

5.9%
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
9.4%

Communication Services

3.8%
3.3%

Energy

3.5%
8.1%

Utilities

2.2%
5.2%

Industrials

SCZ
24.2%
VTV
14.0%

Financial Services

SCZ
12.5%
VTV
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SCZ
12.3%
VTV
4.0%

Technology

SCZ
10.8%
VTV
13.4%

Basic Materials

SCZ
10.2%
VTV
3.1%

Real Estate

SCZ
9.9%
VTV
2.8%

Healthcare

SCZ
5.9%
VTV
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

SCZ
4.7%
VTV
9.4%

Communication Services

SCZ
3.8%
VTV
3.3%

Energy

SCZ
3.5%
VTV
8.1%

Utilities

SCZ
2.2%
VTV
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCZ vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCZ
SCZ Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCZ vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCZVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.47

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

4.25

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.36

16.04

-8.68

SCZ vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCZ and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCZ vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, roughly equal to the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCZVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.86%

-59.27%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-6.35%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.06%

-14.52%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.87%

-17.04%

-19.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.07%

-36.78%

-4.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

0.00%

-1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.05%

-7.86%

-5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

1.68%

+1.34%

Volatility

SCZ vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.34%. This indicates that SCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCZVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

3.34%

+1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.52%

7.82%

+4.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.93%

10.38%

+4.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

13.92%

+2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.43%

16.68%

+0.75%

SCZ vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCZ vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than VTV's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
3.01%3.30%3.50%2.96%1.99%2.96%1.52%3.52%2.79%2.38%2.82%2.06%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.83%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCZ and VTV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCZ has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to VTV (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCZ dropped -61.86% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.78% vs 8.64% for SCZ. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 8.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCZ.

SCZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 1.83% for VTV.

SCZ is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCZ and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCZ and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer