SCZ vs. VHT
SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) and VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, while VHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCZ returned 8.22%/yr vs 9.70%/yr for VHT. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCZ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VHT.
Performance
SCZ vs. VHT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCZ achieves a 9.33% return, which is significantly higher than VHT's -2.22% return. Over the past 10 years, SCZ has underperformed VHT with an annualized return of 8.22%, while VHT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.70% annualized return.
SCZ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 9.33%
- 6M
- 10.37%
- 1Y
- 23.06%
- 3Y*
- 15.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.80%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
VHT
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- -2.22%
- 6M
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- 16.27%
- 3Y*
- 6.30%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.70%
SCZ vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 9.33% | 32.08% | 1.52% | 12.98% | -21.27% | 10.12% | 11.71% | 24.68% | -17.64% | 32.72% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -2.22% | 15.46% | 2.66% | 2.52% | -5.60% | 20.57% | 18.29% | 21.87% | 5.58% | 23.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCZ and VHT is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2007 | 0.60 |
The correlation between SCZ and VHT shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCZ vs. VHT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCZ
VHT
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
SCZ
VHT
Financial Services
SCZ
VHT
Consumer Cyclical
SCZ
VHT
-
Technology
SCZ
VHT
Basic Materials
SCZ
VHT
-
Real Estate
SCZ
VHT
-
Healthcare
SCZ
VHT
Consumer Defensive
SCZ
VHT
-
Communication Services
SCZ
VHT
-
Energy
SCZ
VHT
-
Utilities
SCZ
VHT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCZ vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank
SCZ
VHT
SCZ vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCZ | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.20 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 1.57 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.65 | 3.87 | +3.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCZ vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, which is greater than VHT's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and VHT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCZ | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.86% | -39.12% | -22.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -10.40% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.06% | -16.91% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.87% | -17.71% | -19.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.07% | -28.85% | -12.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.99% | -5.32% | +3.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.04% | -5.98% | -7.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 4.21% | -1.19% |
Volatility
SCZ vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) have volatilities of 4.96% and 4.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCZ | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 4.84% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.56% | 10.37% | +2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.89% | 14.65% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 15.02% | +1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 16.97% | +0.46% |
SCZ vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VHT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCZ vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison
SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than VHT's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 3.19% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.68% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCZ and VHT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCZ has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to VHT (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCZ dropped -61.86% vs VHT's -39.12%.
On 10-year performance, VHT leads with 9.70% vs 8.22% for SCZ. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VHT has been the lower-risk option at 4.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VHT has performed better with a 9.70% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCZ.
SCZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 1.68% for VHT.
SCZ is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while VHT is Health & Biotech Equities. SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, while VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCZ and 0.09% for VHT.
SCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCZ and VHT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer