PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCZ vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCZ vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCZ achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than VBR's 14.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SCZ has underperformed VBR with an annualized return of 8.64%, while VBR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.99% annualized return.


SCZ

1D
0.47%
1M
1.01%
YTD
9.70%
6M
11.43%
1Y
23.50%
3Y*
15.38%
5Y*
4.99%
10Y*
8.64%

VBR

1D
0.87%
1M
6.17%
YTD
14.60%
6M
12.92%
1Y
29.93%
3Y*
16.09%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCZ vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
9.70%32.08%1.52%12.98%-21.27%10.12%11.71%24.68%-17.64%32.72%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
14.60%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SCZ and VBR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2007

0.72

The correlation between SCZ and VBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCZ vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCZ
VBR

Industrials

24.2%
18.1%

Financial Services

12.5%
17.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
12.4%

Technology

10.8%
10.6%

Basic Materials

10.2%
6.3%

Real Estate

9.9%
10.1%

Healthcare

5.9%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.0%

Communication Services

3.8%
2.5%

Energy

3.5%
5.2%

Utilities

2.2%
4.8%

Industrials

SCZ
24.2%
VBR
18.1%

Financial Services

SCZ
12.5%
VBR
17.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SCZ
12.3%
VBR
12.4%

Technology

SCZ
10.8%
VBR
10.6%

Basic Materials

SCZ
10.2%
VBR
6.3%

Real Estate

SCZ
9.9%
VBR
10.1%

Healthcare

SCZ
5.9%
VBR
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

SCZ
4.7%
VBR
4.0%

Communication Services

SCZ
3.8%
VBR
2.5%

Energy

SCZ
3.5%
VBR
5.2%

Utilities

SCZ
2.2%
VBR
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCZ vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCZ
SCZ Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCZ vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCZVBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.31

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

3.17

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.36

11.22

-3.86

SCZ vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCZ and VBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCZ vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, roughly equal to the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and VBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCZVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.86%

-61.98%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-8.85%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.06%

-24.19%

+9.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.87%

-24.19%

-12.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.07%

-45.28%

+4.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

0.00%

-1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.05%

-8.26%

-4.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.50%

+0.52%

Volatility

SCZ vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) at 4.43%. This indicates that SCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCZVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

4.43%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.52%

10.65%

+1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.93%

15.36%

-0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

19.79%

-2.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.43%

21.74%

-4.31%

SCZ vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCZ vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than VBR's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
3.01%3.30%3.50%2.96%1.99%2.96%1.52%3.52%2.79%2.38%2.82%2.06%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.71%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCZ and VBR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCZ has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to VBR (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCZ dropped -61.86% vs VBR's -61.98%.

On 10-year performance, VBR leads with 10.99% vs 8.64% for SCZ. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBR has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 8.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCZ.

SCZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 1.71% for VBR.

SCZ is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCZ and 0.05% for VBR.

VBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCZ and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer