PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCZ vs. GWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCZ vs. GWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF (GWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCZ achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly lower than GWX's 11.79% return. Over the past 10 years, SCZ has outperformed GWX with an annualized return of 8.03%, while GWX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.57% annualized return.


SCZ

1D
-0.72%
1M
2.75%
YTD
9.56%
6M
12.13%
1Y
24.04%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
8.03%

GWX

1D
-1.21%
1M
0.57%
YTD
11.79%
6M
14.68%
1Y
30.65%
3Y*
17.00%
5Y*
5.61%
10Y*
7.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCZ vs. GWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
9.56%32.08%1.52%12.98%-21.27%10.12%11.71%24.68%-17.64%32.72%
GWX
SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF
11.79%35.89%0.21%10.94%-19.98%9.66%13.41%18.18%-18.97%28.88%

Correlation

The correlation between SCZ and GWX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007

0.93

The correlation between SCZ and GWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCZ vs. GWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCZ
GWX

Industrials

24.6%
22.0%

Financial Services

12.5%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
11.2%

Basic Materials

10.7%
14.5%

Real Estate

10.3%
7.2%

Technology

9.1%
15.1%

Healthcare

5.5%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.7%

Communication Services

4.1%
2.9%

Energy

3.7%
4.7%

Utilities

2.8%
1.3%

Industrials

SCZ
24.6%
GWX
22.0%

Financial Services

SCZ
12.5%
GWX
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SCZ
11.8%
GWX
11.2%

Basic Materials

SCZ
10.7%
GWX
14.5%

Real Estate

SCZ
10.3%
GWX
7.2%

Technology

SCZ
9.1%
GWX
15.1%

Healthcare

SCZ
5.5%
GWX
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

SCZ
5.0%
GWX
4.7%

Communication Services

SCZ
4.1%
GWX
2.9%

Energy

SCZ
3.7%
GWX
4.7%

Utilities

SCZ
2.8%
GWX
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCZ vs. GWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCZ
SCZ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

GWX
GWX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
GWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCZ vs. GWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF (GWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCZGWXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.67

1.98

-0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.39

2.75

-0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.35

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

2.58

-0.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.08

10.03

-1.96

SCZ vs. GWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the GWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCZ and GWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCZGWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

1.98

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.34

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.44

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.23

+0.04

Drawdowns

SCZ vs. GWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, roughly equal to the maximum GWX drawdown of -63.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and GWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCZGWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.86%

-63.25%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-11.91%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.06%

-14.73%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.87%

-34.58%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.07%

-45.27%

+4.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-2.86%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.06%

-14.74%

+1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

3.06%

-0.08%

Volatility

SCZ vs. GWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) is 4.57%, while SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF (GWX) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that SCZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCZGWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

5.21%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.95%

12.82%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.47%

15.52%

-1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

16.74%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.43%

17.36%

+0.07%

SCZ vs. GWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SCZ and GWX have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

SCZ vs. GWX - Dividend Comparison

SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than GWX's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWX
SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF
2.54%2.83%2.71%2.64%2.71%2.75%1.74%3.41%2.94%5.18%4.21%2.67%
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
3.01%3.30%3.50%2.96%1.99%2.96%1.52%3.52%2.79%2.38%2.82%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SCZ and GWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GWX has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to SCZ (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCZ dropped -61.86% vs GWX's -63.25%.

On 10-year performance, SCZ leads with 8.03% vs 7.57% for GWX. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, SCZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCZ has performed better with a 8.03% return vs 7.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCZ and GWX have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

SCZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 2.54% for GWX.

SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, while GWX tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. Under USD2 Billion Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

GWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCZ and GWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer