SCZ vs. EVIBX
SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) and EVIBX (Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston) are both funds - SCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, while EVIBX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past 10 years, SCZ returned 8.64%/yr vs 4.96%/yr for EVIBX. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCZ charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EVIBX.
Performance
SCZ vs. EVIBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCZ achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than EVIBX's 0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, SCZ has outperformed EVIBX with an annualized return of 8.64%, while EVIBX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.96% annualized return.
SCZ
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 11.43%
- 1Y
- 23.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.38%
- 5Y*
- 4.99%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
EVIBX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 6.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.28%
- 5Y*
- 3.92%
- 10Y*
- 4.96%
SCZ vs. EVIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 9.70% | 32.08% | 1.52% | 12.98% | -21.27% | 10.12% | 11.71% | 24.68% | -17.64% | 32.72% |
EVIBX Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston | 0.83% | 8.21% | 6.57% | 10.67% | -8.16% | 5.57% | 4.83% | 13.30% | -2.77% | 6.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCZ and EVIBX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2007 | 0.43 |
The correlation between SCZ and EVIBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCZ vs. EVIBX — Risk / Return Rank
SCZ
EVIBX
SCZ vs. EVIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston (EVIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCZ | EVIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.43 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 2.49 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 12.63 | -5.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCZ vs. EVIBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, which is greater than EVIBX's maximum drawdown of -36.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and EVIBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCZ | EVIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.86% | -36.79% | -25.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -2.35% | -9.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.06% | -3.70% | -11.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.87% | -12.67% | -24.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.07% | -21.06% | -20.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -0.00% | -1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.05% | -4.54% | -8.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 0.46% | +2.56% |
Volatility
SCZ vs. EVIBX - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston (EVIBX) at 0.94%. This indicates that SCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCZ | EVIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 0.94% | +4.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | 2.50% | +10.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.93% | 3.27% | +11.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 4.89% | +11.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 5.40% | +12.03% |
SCZ vs. EVIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than EVIBX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCZ vs. EVIBX - Dividend Comparison
SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than EVIBX's 6.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVIBX Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston | 6.09% | 5.91% | 5.36% | 4.59% | 5.65% | 5.04% | 5.69% | 5.62% | 6.01% | 5.53% | 5.85% | 6.54% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 3.01% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCZ and EVIBX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCZ has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to EVIBX (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCZ dropped -61.86% vs EVIBX's -36.79%.
EVIBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCZ and EVIBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer