SCZ vs. DXIV
SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) and DXIV (Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. SCZ is passively managed, while DXIV is actively managed. Over the past year, SCZ returned 24.04% vs 29.75% for DXIV. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCZ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for DXIV.
Performance
SCZ vs. DXIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCZ achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly lower than DXIV's 10.82% return.
SCZ
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- YTD
- 9.56%
- 6M
- 12.13%
- 1Y
- 24.04%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.03%
DXIV
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 14.26%
- 1Y
- 29.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCZ vs. DXIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 9.56% | 32.08% | -5.69% |
DXIV Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF | 10.82% | 39.12% | -4.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCZ and DXIV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2024 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SCZ and DXIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCZ vs. DXIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCZ
DXIV
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
SCZ
DXIV
Financial Services
SCZ
DXIV
Consumer Cyclical
SCZ
DXIV
Basic Materials
SCZ
DXIV
Real Estate
SCZ
DXIV
Technology
SCZ
DXIV
Healthcare
SCZ
DXIV
Consumer Defensive
SCZ
DXIV
Communication Services
SCZ
DXIV
Energy
SCZ
DXIV
Utilities
SCZ
DXIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCZ vs. DXIV — Risk / Return Rank
SCZ
DXIV
SCZ vs. DXIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF (DXIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCZ | DXIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 2.22 | -0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.39 | 3.02 | -0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.40 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 2.76 | -0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 10.91 | -2.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCZ | DXIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 2.22 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 1.66 | -1.39 |
Drawdowns
SCZ vs. DXIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, which is greater than DXIV's maximum drawdown of -13.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and DXIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCZ | DXIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.86% | -13.71% | -48.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -10.84% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.79% | -1.35% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.06% | -2.47% | -10.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.73% | +0.25% |
Volatility
SCZ vs. DXIV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF (DXIV) at 3.89%. This indicates that SCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCZ | DXIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 3.89% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.95% | 11.08% | +0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.47% | 13.50% | +0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 15.39% | +1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 15.39% | +2.04% |
SCZ vs. DXIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DXIV's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCZ vs. DXIV - Dividend Comparison
SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than DXIV's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXIV Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF | 2.29% | 2.50% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 3.01% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SCZ and DXIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCZ has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to DXIV (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCZ dropped -61.86% vs DXIV's -13.71%.
On 1-year performance, DXIV leads with 29.75% vs 24.04% for SCZ. On fees, DXIV is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DXIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DXIV has performed better with a 29.75% return vs 24.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DXIV is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCZ.
SCZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 2.29% for DXIV.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Dimensional Fund Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCZ and 0.30% for DXIV.
DXIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCZ and DXIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer