PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCZ vs. DDLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCZ vs. DDLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCZ achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly higher than DDLS's 5.70% return. Over the past 10 years, SCZ has underperformed DDLS with an annualized return of 8.03%, while DDLS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.73% annualized return.


SCZ

1D
-0.72%
1M
2.75%
YTD
9.56%
6M
12.13%
1Y
24.04%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
8.03%

DDLS

1D
-0.85%
1M
2.35%
YTD
5.70%
6M
8.32%
1Y
22.41%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
9.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCZ vs. DDLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
9.56%32.08%1.52%12.98%-21.27%10.12%11.71%24.68%-17.64%32.72%
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
5.70%27.97%10.22%15.25%-10.13%17.75%-2.95%24.84%-16.92%26.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SCZ and DDLS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2016

0.84

The correlation between SCZ and DDLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCZ vs. DDLS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCZ
DDLS

Industrials

24.6%
25.1%

Financial Services

12.5%
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
11.2%

Basic Materials

10.7%
8.0%

Real Estate

10.3%
6.3%

Technology

9.1%
7.8%

Healthcare

5.5%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
5.9%

Communication Services

4.1%
3.7%

Energy

3.7%
3.2%

Utilities

2.8%
2.0%

Industrials

SCZ
24.6%
DDLS
25.1%

Financial Services

SCZ
12.5%
DDLS
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SCZ
11.8%
DDLS
11.2%

Basic Materials

SCZ
10.7%
DDLS
8.0%

Real Estate

SCZ
10.3%
DDLS
6.3%

Technology

SCZ
9.1%
DDLS
7.8%

Healthcare

SCZ
5.5%
DDLS
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

SCZ
5.0%
DDLS
5.9%

Communication Services

SCZ
4.1%
DDLS
3.7%

Energy

SCZ
3.7%
DDLS
3.2%

Utilities

SCZ
2.8%
DDLS
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCZ vs. DDLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCZ
SCZ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

DDLS
DDLS Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
DDLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DDLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCZ vs. DDLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCZDDLSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.67

1.75

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.39

2.52

-0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

2.10

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.08

7.89

+0.19

SCZ vs. DDLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the DDLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCZ and DDLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCZDDLSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

1.75

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.70

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.63

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.64

-0.37

Drawdowns

SCZ vs. DDLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, which is greater than DDLS's maximum drawdown of -36.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and DDLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCZDDLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.86%

-36.80%

-25.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-10.69%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.06%

-11.66%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.87%

-19.87%

-17.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.07%

-36.80%

-4.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-3.22%

+1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.06%

-5.71%

-7.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

2.85%

+0.13%

Volatility

SCZ vs. DDLS - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) at 3.89%. This indicates that SCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCZDDLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

3.89%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.95%

10.53%

+1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.47%

12.92%

+1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

13.75%

+2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.43%

15.59%

+1.84%

SCZ vs. DDLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DDLS's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCZ vs. DDLS - Dividend Comparison

SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than DDLS's 3.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
3.54%3.80%4.11%4.05%5.44%3.18%3.16%3.68%1.75%1.60%3.47%0.00%
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
3.01%3.30%3.50%2.96%1.99%2.96%1.52%3.52%2.79%2.38%2.82%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCZ and DDLS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCZ has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to DDLS (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCZ dropped -61.86% vs DDLS's -36.80%.

On 10-year performance, DDLS leads with 9.73% vs 8.03% for SCZ. On fees, SCZ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DDLS has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DDLS has performed better with a 9.73% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCZ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DDLS.

DDLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 3.01% for SCZ.

SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, while DDLS tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCZ and 0.48% for DDLS.

DDLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCZ and DDLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer