SCYVX vs. QUASX
SCYVX (AB Small Cap Value Portfolio) and QUASX (AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio) are both mutual funds - SCYVX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by AllianceBernstein, while QUASX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AllianceBernstein. Over the past 10 years, SCYVX returned 9.21%/yr vs 15.01%/yr for QUASX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCYVX charges 0.92%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for QUASX.
Performance
SCYVX vs. QUASX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SCYVX having a 23.83% return and QUASX slightly lower at 22.99%. Over the past 10 years, SCYVX has underperformed QUASX with an annualized return of 9.21%, while QUASX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.
SCYVX
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 4.79%
- YTD
- 23.83%
- 6M
- 21.60%
- 1Y
- 32.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.11%
- 5Y*
- 5.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
QUASX
- 1D
- 2.71%
- 1M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 22.99%
- 6M
- 18.25%
- 1Y
- 36.87%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
SCYVX vs. QUASX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCYVX AB Small Cap Value Portfolio | 23.83% | -0.02% | 11.46% | 7.82% | -16.68% | 35.56% | 3.45% | 25.72% | -16.43% | 8.97% |
QUASX AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio | 22.99% | 4.85% | 18.49% | 17.83% | -39.09% | 9.76% | 53.85% | 49.85% | -1.02% | 34.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCYVX and QUASX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015 | 0.78 |
The correlation between SCYVX and QUASX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCYVX vs. QUASX — Risk / Return Rank
SCYVX
QUASX
SCYVX vs. QUASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Small Cap Value Portfolio (SCYVX) and AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCYVX | QUASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.25 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | 2.43 | +1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.13 | 8.92 | +2.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCYVX vs. QUASX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCYVX drawdown since its inception was -47.74%, smaller than the maximum QUASX drawdown of -60.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCYVX and QUASX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCYVX | QUASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.74% | -60.97% | +13.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.71% | -15.02% | +6.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.12% | -31.68% | +4.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.12% | -47.37% | +18.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.74% | -47.37% | -0.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -0.07% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.42% | -15.73% | +6.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 4.09% | -1.14% |
Volatility
SCYVX vs. QUASX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB Small Cap Value Portfolio (SCYVX) is 4.20%, while AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX) has a volatility of 8.28%. This indicates that SCYVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCYVX | QUASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 8.28% | -4.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.52% | 19.36% | -7.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.26% | 24.52% | -7.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.75% | 26.50% | -4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.99% | 25.63% | -1.64% |
SCYVX vs. QUASX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCYVX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than QUASX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCYVX vs. QUASX - Dividend Comparison
SCYVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, while QUASX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUASX AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.07% | 9.86% | 18.20% | 19.70% | 9.29% | 2.32% | 9.19% |
SCYVX AB Small Cap Value Portfolio | 3.93% | 4.87% | 4.23% | 0.52% | 5.15% | 7.39% | 0.55% | 5.37% | 6.44% | 5.67% | 0.54% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCYVX and QUASX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QUASX has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to SCYVX (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCYVX dropped -47.74% vs QUASX's -60.97%.
SCYVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCYVX and QUASX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer