SCYB vs. SCHF
SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SCYB returned 6.99% vs 32.67% for SCHF. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCYB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.
Performance
SCYB vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCYB achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 15.56% return.
SCYB
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 6.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHF
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 15.56%
- 6M
- 18.62%
- 1Y
- 32.67%
- 3Y*
- 19.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
SCYB vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 1.55% | 8.33% | 8.15% | 6.74% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 15.56% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 6.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCYB and SCHF is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023 | 0.67 |
The correlation between SCYB and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCYB vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCYB
SCHF
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Financial Services
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
SCYB
SCHF
Communication Services
SCYB
SCHF
Industrials
SCYB
SCHF
Healthcare
SCYB
SCHF
Energy
SCYB
SCHF
Financial Services
SCYB
SCHF
Technology
SCYB
SCHF
Real Estate
SCYB
SCHF
Basic Materials
SCYB
SCHF
Consumer Defensive
SCYB
SCHF
Utilities
SCYB
SCHF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCYB vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
SCYB
SCHF
SCYB vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCYB | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.37 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 2.86 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.87 | 11.11 | +1.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCYB | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.09 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.68 | 0.44 | +1.25 |
Drawdowns
SCYB vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCYB drawdown since its inception was -4.92%, smaller than the maximum SCHF drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCYB and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCYB | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -34.87% | +29.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.44% | -11.48% | +9.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -0.86% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -7.38% | +6.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | 2.95% | -2.41% |
Volatility
SCYB vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) is 1.07%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that SCYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCYB | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 5.66% | -4.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.93% | 13.34% | -10.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 15.74% | -11.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.13% | 16.39% | -11.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.13% | 17.18% | -12.05% |
SCYB vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCYB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCYB vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
SCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than SCHF's 2.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.96% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 6.94% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCYB and SCHF have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHF has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to SCYB (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCYB dropped -4.92% vs SCHF's -34.87%.
On 1-year performance, SCHF leads with 32.67% vs 6.99% for SCYB. On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCYB has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 32.67% return vs 6.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SCHF.
SCYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 2.96% for SCHF.
SCYB is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SCHF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SCYB tracks ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCYB and 0.06% for SCHF.
SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCYB and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer