SCYB vs. SCHA
SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while SCHA is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SCYB returned 6.99% vs 40.27% for SCHA. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCYB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.
Performance
SCYB vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCYB achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 19.79% return.
SCYB
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 6.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHA
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 19.32%
- 1Y
- 40.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 11.13%
SCYB vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 1.55% | 8.33% | 8.15% | 6.74% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 19.79% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 6.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCYB and SCHA is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023 | 0.68 |
The correlation between SCYB and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCYB vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCYB
SCHA
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Financial Services
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
SCYB
SCHA
Communication Services
SCYB
SCHA
Industrials
SCYB
SCHA
Healthcare
SCYB
SCHA
Energy
SCYB
SCHA
Financial Services
SCYB
SCHA
Technology
SCYB
SCHA
Real Estate
SCYB
SCHA
Basic Materials
SCYB
SCHA
Consumer Defensive
SCYB
SCHA
Utilities
SCYB
SCHA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCYB vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
SCYB
SCHA
SCYB vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCYB | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.38 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 4.26 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.87 | 15.66 | -2.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCYB | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.25 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.68 | 0.57 | +1.11 |
Drawdowns
SCYB vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCYB drawdown since its inception was -4.92%, smaller than the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCYB and SCHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCYB | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -42.41% | +37.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.44% | -9.50% | +7.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -0.58% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -7.58% | +7.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | 2.58% | -2.04% |
Volatility
SCYB vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) is 1.07%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that SCYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCYB | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 5.08% | -4.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.93% | 12.83% | -9.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 18.01% | -14.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.13% | 21.93% | -16.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.13% | 22.71% | -17.58% |
SCYB vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCYB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCYB vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
SCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than SCHA's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.00% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 6.94% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCYB and SCHA have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHA has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to SCYB (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCYB dropped -4.92% vs SCHA's -42.41%.
On 1-year performance, SCHA leads with 40.27% vs 6.99% for SCYB. On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCYB has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 40.27% return vs 6.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SCHA.
SCYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 1.00% for SCHA.
SCYB is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SCHA is Small Cap Growth Equities. SCYB tracks ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCYB and 0.04% for SCHA.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCYB and SCHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer