SCUS vs. BFAP
SCUS (Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF) and BFAP (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - SCUS is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Charles Schwab, while BFAP is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SCUS returned 3.94% vs -24.54% for BFAP. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. SCUS charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFAP.
Performance
SCUS vs. BFAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCUS achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than BFAP's -21.08% return.
SCUS
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BFAP
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -5.80%
- YTD
- -21.08%
- 6M
- -21.68%
- 1Y
- -24.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCUS vs. BFAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SCUS Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF | 1.49% | 3.42% |
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April | -21.08% | 8.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCUS and BFAP is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCUS vs. BFAP — Risk / Return Rank
SCUS
BFAP
SCUS vs. BFAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF (SCUS) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCUS | BFAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +6.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +12.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.56 | 0.81 | +1.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 23.76 | -0.74 | +24.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 102.91 | -1.34 | +104.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCUS vs. BFAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCUS drawdown since its inception was -0.17%, smaller than the maximum BFAP drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCUS and BFAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCUS | BFAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -33.31% | +33.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.17% | -33.31% | +33.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -31.41% | +31.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.02% | -11.57% | +11.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | 18.27% | -18.23% |
Volatility
SCUS vs. BFAP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF (SCUS) is 0.22%, while FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) has a volatility of 5.12%. This indicates that SCUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BFAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCUS | BFAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.22% | 5.12% | -4.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.50% | 16.89% | -16.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68% | 21.43% | -20.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.71% | 20.47% | -19.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.71% | 20.47% | -19.76% |
SCUS vs. BFAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCUS has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than BFAP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCUS vs. BFAP - Dividend Comparison
SCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than BFAP's 24.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April | 24.04% | 18.97% | 0.00% |
SCUS Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF | 3.91% | 4.17% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCUS and BFAP have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BFAP has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to SCUS (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCUS dropped -0.17% vs BFAP's -33.31%.
On 1-year performance, SCUS leads with 3.94% vs -24.54% for BFAP. On fees, SCUS is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, SCUS has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCUS has performed better with a 3.94% return vs -24.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCUS is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFAP.
BFAP has the higher dividend yield at 24.04%, compared with 3.91% for SCUS.
SCUS is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while BFAP is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for SCUS and 0.90% for BFAP.
SCUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.84 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCUS and BFAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer