BFAP vs. BITI

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BFAP (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BFAP is actively managed, while BITI is passively managed. Over the past year, BFAP returned -28.63% vs 56.28% for BITI. Their -0.96 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BFAP charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

BFAP vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFAP achieves a -21.55% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 25.22% return.

BFAP

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 1.52%
• 6M: -14.46%
• YTD: -21.55%
• 1Y: -28.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -11.16%

BITI

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: -4.03%
• 6M: 13.09%
• YTD: 25.22%
• 1Y: 56.28%
• 3Y*: -32.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -35.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April	$15.29K	$12.55K	$25.71K
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	$24.18M	$25.87M	$38.72M

BFAP vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April	-21.55%	8.90%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	25.22%	-10.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BFAP and BITI is -0.97, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025	-0.96

The correlation between BFAP and BITI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.97 to -0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BFAP vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BFAP

BFAP Risk / Return Rank: 1
BFAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BFAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BFAP Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BFAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BFAP Martin Ratio Rank: 2

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 51
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BFAP vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BFAP	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.33	1.28	-2.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.88	1.86	-3.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	1.22	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.84	2.24	-3.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.35	5.45	-6.80

BFAP vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFAP Sharpe Ratio is -1.33, which is lower than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFAP and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BFAP vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFAP drawdown since its inception was -34.15%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFAP and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFAP	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.15%	-92.16%	+58.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.15%	-25.28%	-8.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-84.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.82%	-86.33%	+54.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.35%	-68.61%	+55.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.27%	10.37%	+10.90%

Volatility

BFAP vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) is 4.00%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 8.93%. This indicates that BFAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BFAP	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	8.93%	-4.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.78%	33.35%	-18.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.61%	44.25%	-22.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.01%	52.01%	-32.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.01%	52.01%	-32.00%

BFAP vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFAP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFAP vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

BFAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.18%, more than BITI's 21.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April	24.18%	18.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	21.80%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFAP and BITI in my portfolio?

BFAP and BITI have a correlation of -0.97, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BFAP or BITI?

BITI has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to BFAP (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFAP dropped -34.15% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, BFAP or BITI?

On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 56.28% vs -28.63% for BFAP. On fees, BFAP is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, BFAP has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BFAP or BITI?

Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 56.28% return vs -28.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BFAP or BITI?

BFAP is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BFAP or BITI?

BFAP has the higher dividend yield at 24.18%, compared with 21.80% for BITI.

What is the main difference between BFAP and BITI?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFAP and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.