PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCUB vs. SCMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCUB vs. SCMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB) and Sterling Capital Multi-Strategy Income ETF (SCMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SCUB

1D
0.04%
1M
0.36%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCMC

1D
0.19%
1M
0.73%
6M
2.08%
YTD
2.33%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCUB vs. SCMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCUB and SCMC is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026

0.61

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCUB vs. SCMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB) and Sterling Capital Multi-Strategy Income ETF (SCMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCUB vs. SCMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCUB vs. SCMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCUB drawdown since its inception was -0.08%, smaller than the maximum SCMC drawdown of -1.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCUB and SCMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCUBSCMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-1.91%

+1.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.03%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

-0.33%

+0.32%

Volatility

SCUB vs. SCMC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCUBSCMCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79%

2.82%

-2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.79%

2.82%

-2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.79%

2.82%

-2.03%

SCUB vs. SCMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCUB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SCMC's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCUB vs. SCMC - Dividend Comparison

SCUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than SCMC's 2.60% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SCUB and SCMC have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCUB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCUB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SCMC.

SCMC has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 1.33% for SCUB.

SCUB is categorized as Actively Managed, while SCMC is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SCUB and 0.55% for SCMC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCUB and SCMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer