PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCMC vs. SCNM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCMC vs. SCNM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Multi-Strategy Income ETF (SCMC) and Sterling Capital National Municipal Bond ETF (SCNM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCMC achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly higher than SCNM's 1.26% return.


SCMC

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.96%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCNM

1D
0.18%
1M
0.67%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCMC vs. SCNM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCMC and SCNM is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCMC vs. SCNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Multi-Strategy Income ETF (SCMC) and Sterling Capital National Municipal Bond ETF (SCNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCMC vs. SCNM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCMCSCNMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.40

0.84

+0.56

Drawdowns

SCMC vs. SCNM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCMC drawdown since its inception was -1.91%, smaller than the maximum SCNM drawdown of -2.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCMC and SCNM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCMCSCNMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-2.81%

+0.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.58%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.37%

-0.83%

+0.46%

Volatility

SCMC vs. SCNM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCMCSCNMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84%

3.28%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.84%

3.28%

-0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.84%

3.28%

-0.44%

SCMC vs. SCNM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCMC has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SCNM's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCMC vs. SCNM - Dividend Comparison

SCMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than SCNM's 1.50% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SCMC and SCNM have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCNM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCNM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SCMC.

SCMC has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 1.50% for SCNM.

SCMC is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while SCNM is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SCMC and 0.35% for SCNM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCMC and SCNM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer