SCUB vs. RCLY

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SCUB (Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF) and RCLY (Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCUB charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for RCLY.

Performance

SCUB vs. RCLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB) and Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF (RCLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SCUB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.32%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RCLY

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.24%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCUB vs. RCLY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.38%
RCLY Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF	3.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SCUB and RCLY is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026	0.19

Return for Risk

SCUB vs. RCLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB) and Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF (RCLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

SCUB vs. RCLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCUB drawdown since its inception was -0.10%, smaller than the maximum RCLY drawdown of -3.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCUB and RCLY.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCUB	RCLY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.10%	-3.69%	+3.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.01%	-0.73%	+0.72%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SCUB	RCLY	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84%	3.61%	-2.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.84%	3.61%	-2.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.84%	3.61%	-2.77%

SCUB vs. RCLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCUB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than RCLY's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCUB vs. RCLY - Dividend Comparison

SCUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, while RCLY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
RCLY Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF	0.00%
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCUB and RCLY in my portfolio?

SCUB and RCLY have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SCUB or RCLY?

On fees, SCUB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCUB or RCLY?

SCUB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for RCLY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCUB or RCLY?

SCUB has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.00% for RCLY.

What is the main difference between SCUB and RCLY?

They also come from different issuers: Sterling Capital and Reckoner. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SCUB and 0.55% for RCLY.