SCSPX vs. LSSAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SCSPX (Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund) and LSSAX (Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, SCSPX returned 1.75%/yr vs 2.36%/yr for LSSAX. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SCSPX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for LSSAX.

Performance

SCSPX vs. LSSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund (SCSPX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCSPX achieves a -0.25% return, which is significantly lower than LSSAX's 0.81% return. Over the past 10 years, SCSPX has underperformed LSSAX with an annualized return of 1.75%, while LSSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.36% annualized return.

SCSPX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.99%
• 6M: -0.68%
• YTD: -0.25%
• 1Y: 2.60%
• 3Y*: 4.24%
• 5Y*: 0.62%
• 10Y*: 1.75%
• ALL TIME*: 2.13%

LSSAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.76%
• 6M: 0.30%
• YTD: 0.81%
• 1Y: 4.81%
• 3Y*: 5.73%
• 5Y*: 1.18%
• 10Y*: 2.36%
• ALL TIME*: 3.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SCSPX Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SCSPX vs. LSSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCSPX Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund	-0.25%	7.61%	2.38%	4.51%	-9.02%	-1.05%	4.58%	6.24%	1.49%	3.09%
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund	0.81%	8.32%	3.94%	7.01%	-11.82%	0.64%	4.68%	6.81%	2.48%	3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SCSPX and LSSAX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012	0.84

The correlation between SCSPX and LSSAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SCSPX vs. LSSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCSPX

SCSPX Risk / Return Rank: 30
SCSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
SCSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
SCSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SCSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
SCSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

LSSAX

LSSAX Risk / Return Rank: 64
LSSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
LSSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
LSSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
LSSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
LSSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCSPX vs. LSSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund (SCSPX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCSPX	LSSAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	1.43	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	2.18	-0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.26	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	2.64	-1.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.30	8.13	-4.83

SCSPX vs. LSSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCSPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the LSSAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCSPX and LSSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCSPX vs. LSSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCSPX drawdown since its inception was -13.41%, smaller than the maximum LSSAX drawdown of -16.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCSPX and LSSAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCSPX	LSSAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.41%	-16.40%	+2.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.91%	-2.16%	-0.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.36%	-5.09%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.32%	-16.31%	+2.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-13.41%	-16.40%	+2.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.16%	-1.30%	-0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.16%	-1.97%	-0.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.13%	0.67%	+0.46%

Volatility

SCSPX vs. LSSAX - Volatility Comparison

Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund (SCSPX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) have volatilities of 1.02% and 1.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCSPX	LSSAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.02%	1.04%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.86%	2.89%	-0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.61%	3.99%	-0.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.99%	5.83%	-0.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.96%	4.44%	-0.48%

SCSPX vs. LSSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCSPX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than LSSAX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCSPX vs. LSSAX - Dividend Comparison

SCSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than LSSAX's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund	4.38%	4.23%	4.54%	5.65%	6.47%	6.38%	5.95%	5.48%	5.62%	5.42%	5.12%	5.20%
SCSPX Sterling Capital Quality Income Fund	3.63%	3.85%	3.60%	2.57%	2.37%	2.05%	2.50%	2.99%	3.19%	2.74%	2.66%	2.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCSPX and LSSAX in my portfolio?

SCSPX and LSSAX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCSPX or LSSAX?

LSSAX has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to SCSPX (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCSPX dropped -13.41% vs LSSAX's -16.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LSSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.